THE HEALTH SERVICE UTILIZATION OF LIVER CANCER INPATIENTS WITH DIFFERENT TYPES OF HEALTH INSURANCE IN CHINA

Author(s)

Li Y1, Ma Y2, Fang Y2
1Institute of Medicinal Plant Development, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China, 2Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China

OBJECTIVES: This study examines the direct medical cost difference of liver cancer inpatients with different types of health insurance from 2010 to 2013in China. METHODS: A nationwide,cross-sectional sampling of liver cancer inpatients with disease code ICD-10(C22) with basic medical insurance scheme for employees(BMISE) and basic medical insurance scheme for urban residents(BMISUR) was extracted from the China Health Insurance Research Association claim database.A retrospective analysis was adopted and and all results were extrapolated to the whole country according to the scale of the population, economics and other factors in the sample cities. RESULTS: For BMISE,the liver cancer inpatients accounted for 0.47% of total visits, 5.57% in all malignant neoplasms inpatients,and the hospitalization expenses accounted for 0.90% and 6.31% in all hospitalization expenses and all malignant neoplasms hospitalization expenses separately.The Reimbursement rate,the average hospitalization expenses of each visit, length of stay and the average hospitalization expenses of  every day were 71.53%, ¥18,432, 19.20 and ¥1,294.But for BMISUR,the liver cancer inpatients accounted for 0.29% of total visits, 5.82% in all malignant neoplasms inpatients,and the hospitalization expenses accounted for 0.68% and 6.43% in all hospitalization expenses and all malignant neoplasms hospitalization expenses.The Reimbursement rate,the average hospitalization expenses of each visit,length of stay and the average hospitalization expenses of  every day were 52.08%, ¥13,878, 16.00 and ¥868 separately. CONCLUSIONS: The insurance level difference between two medical insurance schemes influences the treatment regimens and benefits received by patients.For the people with BMISUR,the reimbursement rate was only 50%, and had 20% gap with BMISE,needing to raise reimbursement rate,setting up differentiated reimbursement for different income level groups.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2016-05, ISPOR 2016, Washington DC, USA

Value in Health, Vol. 19, No. 3 (May 2016)

Code

PCN186

Topic

Economic Evaluation, Health Policy & Regulatory, Health Service Delivery & Process of Care

Topic Subcategory

Cost/Cost of Illness/Resource Use Studies, Health Care Research, Reimbursement & Access Policy

Disease

Oncology

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×