SPANISH THERAPEUTIC POSITIONING REPORTS- A HIGH HURDLE THAT IS POINTLESS TO OVERCOME?

Author(s)

Macaulay R1, Griffiths EA2
1PAREXEL Access Consulting, London, UK, 2PAREXEL, London, UK

OBJECTIVES: There are 17 autonomous regions in Spain, which can each make distinct pricing and reimbursement decisions for medicines. In an effort to introduce more consistency, the Spanish Agency for Medicines and Health Products (AEMPS) has issued national therapeutic positioning reports (TPRs) for new medicines since 2012. These are comparative efficacy and safety reports which specify the patient population that will benefit most from any new medicine. This research aims to analyse the number, indications and outcomes of TPRs. METHODS: All publically available TPRs were screened up to 31st December 2015 and the date, decision, drug, and indication were extracted.   RESULTS: CONCLUSIONS: The number of TPRs being issued has dramatically increased in 2015, and these reports frequently conclude that a new therapy can be considered as a treatment option but is not superior to currently reimbursed alternatives. However, the impact of TPRs has been questioned as they are not mandatory for regions to follow and do not include economic evaluations as standard, a key consideration for regional bodies, especially in the current economic climate.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2016-05, ISPOR 2016, Washington DC, USA

Value in Health, Vol. 19, No. 3 (May 2016)

Code

PHP23

Topic

Health Policy & Regulatory, Health Service Delivery & Process of Care, Health Technology Assessment, Real World Data & Information Systems

Topic Subcategory

Decision & Deliberative Processes, Health & Insurance Records Systems, Health Care Research, Health Disparities & Equity, Hospital and Clinical Practices, Pricing Policy & Schemes, Reimbursement & Access Policy

Disease

Multiple Diseases

Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×