RETROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS OF THE ECONOMIC BURDEN OF PATIENTS DIAGNOSED WITH CONGESTIVE HEART FAILURE IN THE CALIFORNIA MEDICAID POPULATION

Author(s)

Ogbomo A1, Zhao Y1, Kariburyo MF1, Xie L1, Yuce H2, Baser O3
1STATinMED Research, Ann Arbor, MI, USA, 2New York City College of Technology-CUNY and STATinMED Research, New York, NY, USA, 3Columbia University and STATinMED Research, New York, NY, USA

OBJECTIVES: To examine the health care utilizations and costs for patients diagnosed with congestive heart failure (CHF) in the California Medicaid (Medi-Cal) population. METHODS: A retrospective database analysis was performed using Medi-Cal claims from January 2009 through December 2014. Patients diagnosed with CHF (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification diagnosis code 428.x) were identified in the Medi-Cal database from 01JAN2010 through 31DEC2013. The initial diagnosis date was designated as the index date. A comparison cohort was created by identifying patients without a CHF diagnosis, but of similar age, gender, race, and index year. The index date for the comparison cohort was randomly chosen to reduce selection bias. Patients in both cohorts were required to be at least age 18 years and have continuous medical and pharmacy benefits 1-year pre- and post-index date. One-to-one propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to compare follow-up health care costs and utilizations between the cohorts, adjusting for demographic characteristics and baseline Charlson Comorbidity Index score. RESULTS: Eligible patients (N=10,790) were identified for the CHF and comparison cohorts. After 1:1 PSM, a total of 1,587 patients were matched from each cohort and baseline characteristics were balanced. A higher percentage of CHF patients had inpatient admissions (66.48% vs. 14.05%, p<0.0001), outpatient visits (98.61% vs. 75.17%, p<0.0001), and emergency room visits (66.60% vs. 27.60%, p<0.0001) compared to those without a CHF diagnosis. The CHF cohort also incurred significantly higher inpatient ($21,000 vs. $2,362, p<0.0001), outpatient ($7,595 vs. $2,362, p<0.0001), pharmacy ($3,621 vs. $1,653, p<0.0001), and total costs ($32,215 vs. $6,637, p<0.0001) than the comparison cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Results indicated that CHF patients incurred significantly higher costs and had higher health care resource utilization than those without CHF.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2016-05, ISPOR 2016, Washington DC, USA

Value in Health, Vol. 19, No. 3 (May 2016)

Code

PCV42

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Cost/Cost of Illness/Resource Use Studies

Disease

Cardiovascular Disorders

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×