REAL-WORLD COST PER PERSISTING PATIENT- COMPARING PSORIASIS PATIENTS INITIATED ON APREMILAST OR BIOLOGIC THERAPIES

Author(s)

Feldman SR1, Kuznik A2, Clancy Z3
1Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA, 2Celgene Corp & Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Warren, NJ, USA, 3Celgene Corporation, Summit, NJ, USA

OBJECTIVES: Compare the cost per persisting patient among psoriasis (PsO) patients initiating apremilast or biologics from the US managed care perspective. METHODS: Adults with ≥2 diagnosis codes for psoriasis (ICD-10:L40) were selected from the MarketScan Commercial and Medicare Supplemental Databases (2014-2015). The first prescription date was defined as the index date; patients had to be continuously enrolled for ≥6 months pre-index and ≥3 months post-index. Biologic users had to be treatment-naïve to index medication in the pre-index period; prior use of another biologic was not reason for exclusion. Treatment persistence, defined as the lack of a gap of ≥60 consecutive days after the end of supply of a prescription fill, was assessed at 6 months post-index. Healthcare costs (2014 US$) were defined as PsO-specific pharmacy costs incurred by payers over 6 months. The analysis assumed patients discontinue treatment if benefits received do not outweigh risks. A patient on therapy for 6 months was assumed to be benefitting from treatment and was considered a persisting patient. The cost per persisting patient was calculated by dividing cumulative cost at month 6 by persistence rate at month 6 for apremilast and biologic therapy. RESULTS:

Conference/Value in Health Info

2016-05, ISPOR 2016, Washington DC, USA

Value in Health, Vol. 19, No. 3 (May 2016)

Code

PSS21

Topic

Patient-Centered Research

Topic Subcategory

Adherence, Persistence, & Compliance

Disease

Sensory System Disorders

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×