MARKET ACCESS AND PRICING ANALYSIS OF ULTRA-ORPHAN DRUGS

Author(s)

Malacan J1, Gabriel S2, Dinet J3, Forget S4, Borget I5
1University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA, 2IPSEN Pharma, Boulogne-Billancourt, France, 3Ipsen, Boulogne-Billancourt, France, 4BlueDil, Paris, France, 5Univ Paris-Sud, Faculty of Pharmacy, GRADES, Châtenay-Malabry, France

OBJECTIVES: Our objective is to identify key characteristics and trends in ultra-orphan drugs’ (UODs) market access and pricing. METHODS: Our analysis was based on 25 UODs currently available in France. We reviewed data collected from EMA, HAS (French HTA), FDA, Orphanet®, Eurordis®, clinicaltrial.gov websites, promotors press releases, financial report, IHS® and Micromedex® databases. For each UOD, an analysis of their indication, French HTA agency assessments and US & major EU country cost of treatment was performed. RESULTS: Among these 25 drugs, 17 drugs had only one indication and 4 indications have multiple marketed drugs. 5 companies holds 68% of the UOD global market. Access was achieved earlier in the US for 68% of drugs and 80% of products were granted an Orphan Drug Designation. Most UODs had limited development programs, enrolling 59 patients per trial on average, commonly adopting intermediate endpoints, and using single arm trials.  In France, HAS has given the highest available SMR level for all these UODs, leading to full reimbursement. The majority (65%) of indications have the highest ASMR levels (I, II or III), allowing European price eligibility. The yearly average treatment cost per patient was higher in the US for 54% of these products, equivalent for 33%, and lower for 13%. Average cost was 442k€ in the US vs 376k€ in Europe. In France, treatment cost was inversely correlated with population size, but not to the ASMR level. Per patient annual treatment costs tend to increase over time in Europe. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the small patient population, the UODs market shows a considerable development activity. However limited development programs and evidence uncertainty is a major consideration regarding the UODs, they have been able to achieve good HTA scores, favorable reimbursement decisions and very high prices.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2016-05, ISPOR 2016, Washington DC, USA

Value in Health, Vol. 19, No. 3 (May 2016)

Code

PSY94

Topic

Health Technology Assessment

Topic Subcategory

Decision & Deliberative Processes

Disease

Multiple Diseases, Rare and Orphan Diseases

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×