IMPACT OF DISEASE PROGRESSION ON PATIENT REPORTED OUTCOMES IN ADVANCED NSCLC- EVIDENCE FROM PATIENTS TREATED IN REAL WORLD COMMUNITY ONCOLOGY SETTINGS

Author(s)

Walker MS1, Wong W2, Ravelo A2, Hazard S2, Miller PJ1, Schwartzberg L3
1Vector Oncology, Memphis, TN, USA, 2Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, TN, USA, 3The West Clinic, Memphis, TN, USA

OBJECTIVES: Treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) involves balancing the efficacy and tolerability of treatments, including the impact of disease progression on health-related quality of life (HRQOL).  We report findings from a prospective medical record registry that examined HRQOL as measured by patient reported outcomes (PROs) in patients (pts) newly diagnosed with advanced NSCLC through one year of follow-up. METHODS: Pts starting first-line treatment of stage IIIB/IV nonsquamous NSCLC were prospectively enrolled and consented at 34 US-based community oncology settings.  PROs were collected once per cycle during treatment, and at each visit if patients discontinued treatment.  PROs included the EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-LC13, the MDASI-LC, and the Rotterdam Activity Level Scale (RALS).    RESULTS: Of 155 eligible pts enrolled, 145 provided follow-up data, including 1,100 PRO surveys.  Pts received standard, widely used chemotherapy regimens, and were 58.5% male, 86.4% Caucasian, with mean age 64.8 (±10.9) years.  13.6% had impaired performance status (ECOG 2+ or equivalent).  PFS events occurred in 141 of 147 pts (95.9%) based on scan records and physician progress notes, with overall median PFS of 5.59 (4.83-6.25) months.  Fifty-nine pts provided PRO data after disease progression.  Linear mixed models showed that disease progression was associated with significant or near significant adverse impact on HRQOL in 18 of 32 PRO endpoints.  Among the 12 significant effects, the average adverse effect of disease progression was 5.7% of the instrument range, where 5% - 10% change is the minimum important difference (Ringash, et al., 2007).  The strongest effects were QLQ-LC13, Sore mouth (8.0%) and Dyspnea (7.3%), and QLQ-C30 constipation (7.6%).  Effects on the QLQ-C30 Global Health Status and Physical Functioning measures were 4.7% and 5.3%, respectively (all p < 0.05).  CONCLUSIONS: PROs showed significant and clinically meaningful worsening of symptoms at disease progression, as indicated by widely used HRQOL measures.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2016-05, ISPOR 2016, Washington DC, USA

Value in Health, Vol. 19, No. 3 (May 2016)

Code

PCN147

Topic

Patient-Centered Research

Topic Subcategory

Patient-reported Outcomes & Quality of Life Outcomes

Disease

Oncology

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×