HOW TO MEASURE 'OPIOID RELAPSE' IN REAL-WORLD CLAIMS DATA

Author(s)

Montejano LB1, Ronquest NA2, Willson TM1, Wollschlaeger BA3, Cole AL1, Nadipelli VR2
1Truven Health Analytics, Ann Arbor, MI, USA, 2Indivior Inc., Richmond, VA, USA, 3Aventura Family Health Center, North Miami Beach, FL, USA

OBJECTIVES: Opioid Use Disorder (OUD) is characterized by episodes of relapse and remission. Relapse is a key outcome and quality metric in OUD, but has no specific diagnosis code. This study examined different approaches to measuring relapse in claims data. METHODS: Service-based indicators of opioid relapse were defined in several measures. The conservative measure (CM) included any of the following: diagnosis of continuous or episodic dependence following a dependence in remission diagnosis; hospitalization with a primary opioid-related diagnosis; detoxification with any opioid-related diagnosis; or emergency services with any opioid-related diagnosis. Inclusive measures (IMs) included the CM or any of the following indicators: hospitalization with a secondary diagnosis of opioid overdose; pharmacy claim for narcotic pain medications (NPMs) without indication of trauma/surgery 7 days prior; pharmacy claim(s) for NPMs covering >30 consecutive days; or abruptly stopping buprenorphine without taper. Relapse rates were measured among OUD patients initiating buprenorphine treatment in the MarketScan databases (2008-2014) and rates compared to the literature to assess measure feasibility. RESULTS: Relapse rates 6 months post-treatment initiation ranged from 7.1% (CM) to 38.1% (IM) in Commercial patients (N=22,563) and 6.0% (CM) to 44.0% (IM) in Medicaid patients (N=7,811). Among the IM indicators, abrupt discontinuation was observed in 23.1% of Commercial patients and 26.6% of Medicaid patients. NPM claims without trauma/surgery were observed among 9.5% of Commercial and 16.7% of Medicaid patients. NPMs covering >30 consecutive days were observed among 9.4% of Commercial and 8.8% of Medicaid patients. CONCLUSIONS: Relapse rates varied widely depending on the measure used.  The literature similarly includes variation in rates due to measurement differences between studies.  This highlights the need for a consistent definition of relapse in claims-based studies, the evidence-based utilization of defined measures, and future research targeting the validation of claims-based markers of opioid relapse.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2016-05, ISPOR 2016, Washington DC, USA

Value in Health, Vol. 19, No. 3 (May 2016)

Code

PRM6

Topic

Clinical Outcomes

Topic Subcategory

Clinical Outcomes Assessment

Disease

Mental Health

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×