EXAMINATION OF EQUITY IN THE DELIVERY OF PERSONALISED MEDICINES
Author(s)
Martin AP, Haycox A, Downing J, Alfirevic A, Pirmohamed M
University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
OBJECTIVES: The remit of this review is to appraise considerations of equity in the delivery of personalised medicines. The aim of the review was to analyse evidence relating to the assessment of the effects of personalised medicines not aimed at reducing inequity but where it is important to understand the effects on equity in terms of delivery of care. METHODS: The scope was informed by the Campbell and Cochrane Equity Methods Group and the Cochrane Public Health Group who recommend the PROGRESS-Plus approach to analyse health inequality information. PROGRESS-Plus is an acronym for place of residence, race/ethnicity/culture/language/occupation/, gender/sex, religion, socioeconomic status and social capital and ‘Plus’; captures other characteristics which may indicate a disadvantage, such as age and disability. The categories of focus for identification of factors which may lead to health inequalities in our analysis include income, occupation, education, gender, ethnicity and age. A total of 202 personalised medicines with differing approvals between EMA, FDA, PMDA and HCSC were considered and studies grouped according to therapeutic area. A hypothesis testing approach using a harvest plot was chosen to assess which of three competing hypotheses; positive social gradient, negative social gradient and no gradient is best supported by each study for each dimension of inequality. RESULTS: Findings of health inequalities will be synthesized by presenting relative and absolute differences between groups. Using a harvest plot, a positive social gradient in effectiveness was defined as a situation in which the personalised medicine was more effective in more advantaged groups whereas a negative social gradient in effectiveness was defined as a situation in which a personalised medicine was more effective in disadvantaged groups. CONCLUSIONS: The review aims to identify evidence of personalised medicines with a negative social gradient to inform policies to reduce inequalities in health and also highlight gaps in evidence.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2016-05, ISPOR 2016, Washington DC, USA
Value in Health, Vol. 19, No. 3 (May 2016)
Code
PHP47
Topic
Health Policy & Regulatory
Topic Subcategory
Health Disparities & Equity
Disease
Multiple Diseases