DRUG UTILIZATION REVIEW PROGRAM IN SAUDI HOSPITALS- ENABLING FACTORS AND IMPELMENTATION

Author(s)

Alkelya M1, Alsultan M2, AlJeraisy M3
1King Abdullah International Medical Research Center (KAIMRC), Ryiadh, Saudi Arabia, 2University of Dammam, Dammam, Saudi Arabia, 3King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences (KSAU-HS), Ryiadh, Saudi Arabia

OBJECTIVES: Adoption of Drug Utilization Review (DUR) program is essential to optimize the safety and effectiveness of medication use in health care sitting.  The aim of the study is to explore the enabling factors to adopt DUR program and to explore DUR program implementation in Saudi Hospitals.

METHODS: A cross-sectional survey targeted mangers at hospital pharmacy with in-patient and out-patient pharmacies in Riyadh City in 2014. The survey gathered information about the hospital pharmacy services, pharmacy information system (PIS), Pharmacy  & Therapeutics  (P&T)  Committee activities

RESULTS: Of the 30 hospital pharmacies, 23 (76.6%) pharmacy managers responded, and only 21(70%) hospital pharmacies met the inclusion criteria. 18(85.7% ) hospitals have Electronic Medical Record (EMR) and 14(66.67%) of them have Computerized Physician Order Entry (CPOE). 12 (57.2 %) of the hospitals have Pharmacy and laboratory integrated information systems, 6 (28.6%) hospitals have  Clinical Decision-Support Systems (CDSSs), 7(33.3%) hospital pharmacies provide Patient Discharge Counseling Services (PDCS), 13 (61.9%) provide Inpatient Clinical Pharmacy Services(ICPS), 14 (66.7%) provide Therapeutic Drug Monitoring (TDM) services. 8 (38.1%) hospitals have PIS which can detect incorrect dose and duration, 8 (38.1%) for drug-drug interaction, 6(28.6%) for drug-disease Interaction, 7 (33.3%) for contraindication and 11 (52.3%) for early refill detection. Only 6 (28.6%) hospitals PISs have the capability to generate four types of retrospective reports (ranking physicians by utilization, drug they prescribe, most utilized drug by number of patients, most utilized drug by diagnosis. 18 (85.7%) hospitals ' P&T Committee discuss the DUR reports at least once annually. 10 (45.2%) of the hospitals have designated subcommittees for DUR

CONCLUSIONS: The enabling factors for the prospective and concurrent DUR such as  CDSSs, PDCS, ICPS, and PIS detection capabilities are not adopted widely as standard process or  services in Saudi hospitals, likewise the retrospective DUR. The DUR programs at these hospitals have huge opportunity to improve


Conference/Value in Health Info

2016-05, ISPOR 2016, Washington DC, USA

Value in Health, Vol. 19, No. 3 (May 2016)

Code

PHP18

Topic

Health Policy & Regulatory, Health Service Delivery & Process of Care

Topic Subcategory

Formulary Development, Health Care Research, Hospital and Clinical Practices, Prescribing Behavior, Pricing Policy & Schemes

Disease

Multiple Diseases

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×