COST-COMPARISON OF TWO TRABECULAR MICRO-BYPASS STENTS VERSUS SELECTIVE LASER TRABECULOPLASTY OR MEDICATIONS ONLY FOR INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE CONTROL FOR PATIENTS WITH OPEN-ANGLE GLAUCOMA

Author(s)

Berdahl JP1, Khatana AK2, Katz LJ3, Herndon L4, Layton AJ5, Yu TM5, Bauer MJ6, Cantor LB7
1Vance Thompson Vision, Sioux Falls, SD, USA, 2Cincinnati Eye Institute, Cincinnati, OH, USA, 3Wills Eye Hospital, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA, 4Duke Eye Center, Durham, NC, USA, 5Quorum Consulting, Inc, San Francisco, CA, USA, 6Glaukos Corporation, Laguna Hills, CA, USA, 7Eugene and Marilyn Glick Eye Institute, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA

OBJECTIVES: Patients with open-angle glaucoma (OAG) whose intraocular pressure was not adequately controlled by one medication have several alternate treatment options. This analysis evaluated the direct costs in the US of unilateral eye treatment with two trabecular micro-bypass stents (two stents) compared to selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) or medications only over 5 years post-initiation. METHODS: A population-based, annual state-transition, probabilistic, cost-of-care model was used to assess OAG-related direct costs over 5 years. Patients were modeled to initiate treatment in year zero with two stents, SLT, or medications only. In years 1 through 5, patients could remain on initial treatment or move to another treatment option(s), or filtration surgery. Treatment strategy change probabilities were identified by a clinician panel. Direct costs were included for drugs, procedures, and complications. RESULTS: The projected average cumulative cost at 5 years was lower in the two-stent treatment arm ($4,024) compared to the SLT arm ($4,040) or medications only arm ($5,066). Initial year zero costs were higher with two stents ($2,674) than with SLT ($829) or medications only ($806). Average marginal annual costs in years 1 through 5 were $270 for two stents, $642 for SLT, and $852 for medications only. The cumulative costs difference between two stents versus SLT or medications only decreased over time, with breakeven by 5 or 3 years post-initiation, respectively. By year 5, cumulative savings with two stents over SLT or medications only was $16 or $1,042, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Despite higher costs in year zero, annual costs thereafter were lowest in the two-stent treatment arm. Five-year cumulative costs in the two-stent treatment arm were approximately equivalent to the SLT arm, and showed savings compared to the medications only arm. Two-stent treatment may reduce OAG-related health resource use, leading to direct savings, especially over medications only or at longer time horizons.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2016-05, ISPOR 2016, Washington DC, USA

Value in Health, Vol. 19, No. 3 (May 2016)

Code

PMD25

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis

Disease

Sensory System Disorders

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×