COMPARISON OF ARTERIOVENOUS FISTULA (AVF) MAINTENANCE AND ASSOCIATED COSTS BETWEEN TRADITIONAL SURGICAL AVF CREATION AND A NEW ENDOVASCULAR APPROACH
Author(s)
Yang S1, Arnold RJ1, Yu TM1, Glickman M2, Layton AJ1, Rajan DK3, Lok C4
1Quorum Consulting, Inc, San Francisco, CA, USA, 2Eastern Virginia Medical School, Virginia Beach, VA, USA, 3University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada, 4University Health Network-Toronto General Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
OBJECTIVES: Long maturation times and high failure rates are well documented with surgical AVF for hemodialysis access. Post-creation interventions are commonly required to facilitate maturation and maintain function. This study assessed the difference in AVF post-creation maintenance and associated costs between patients using surgical AVF and new endovascular AVF. METHODS: Demographic and clinical information of patients with endovascular AVF were obtained from the single-arm Novel Endovascular Access Trial (NEAT). The 5% random sample from the Medicare Standard Analytical Files (SAFs) were used to assess the post-creation interventions and their costs for patients receiving surgical AVF during 2011-2013. The date of surgical AVF creation was defined as the index date and continuous Medicare enrollment during the 6-months prior-index and 6-month follow-up was required. Patients’ follow-up inpatient, outpatient, and physician claims were examined to identify AVF maintenance procedures and to estimate average cost for each procedure. Medicare patients were matched to 60 NEAT patients with one-to-one propensity score matching using prior-index demographic and clinical characteristics. RESULTS:
Conference/Value in Health Info
2016-05, ISPOR 2016, Washington DC, USA
Value in Health, Vol. 19, No. 3 (May 2016)
Code
PUK15
Topic
Economic Evaluation
Topic Subcategory
Cost/Cost of Illness/Resource Use Studies
Disease
Urinary/Kidney Disorders