COMPARATIVE EFFICACY AND TOLERABILITY OF LURASIDONE FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF BIPOLAR DEPRESSION- A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND NETWORK META-ANALYSIS

Author(s)

Ostacher MJ1, Ng-Mak D2, Patel P3, Ntais D4, Schlueter M4, Loebel A5
1Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA, 2Sunovion Pharmaceuticals Inc., Marlborough, MA, USA, 3Sunovion Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Marlborough, MA, USA, 4IMS Health, London, UK, 5Sunovion Pharmaceuticals Inc., Fort Lee, NJ, USA

OBJECTIVES: While several clinical trials have been conducted to assess atypical antipsychotics for the treatment of patients with bipolar depression, head-to-head data comparing these treatments are lacking. This study aimed to assess the relative clinical efficacy and tolerability of lurasidone monotherapy compared to other atypical antipsychotics for the management of bipolar depression. METHODS: An update of a systematic literature review performed by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence was conducted to identify relevant randomized controlled trials. Outcomes included response, remission, change in Montgomery–Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score from baseline, change in Clinical Global Impressions–Bipolar Disorder–Severity (CGI-BP-S) score from baseline, change in weight from baseline, somnolence, extrapyramidal symptoms, and all-cause discontinuation. Outcomes were analyzed using Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) adopting a random-effects model to incorporate between-trial heterogeneity. RESULTS: Fourteen trials met the inclusion criteria for evidence synthesis. NMA results suggested that lurasidone was associated with better efficacy compared to aripiprazole (mean odds ratio [mOR] for response: 2.40, 95% credible interval [CrI]: 1.36, 3.96, mOR for remission: 2.28, 95% CrI: 1.22, 3.90, mean ΔMADRS: -3.62, 95% Crl: -7.04, -0.20, mean ΔCGI-BP-S: -0.42, 95% Crl: -0.78, -0.07) and ziprasidone (mOR for response: 2.45, 95% CrI: 1.38, 4.05, mOR for remission: 2.18, 95% CrI: 1.21, 3.65, mean ΔMADRS: -3.38, 95% Crl: -6.68, -0.11, mean ΔCGI-BP-S: -0.59, 95% Crl: -0.94, -0.24). Compared to quetiapine, lurasidone had similar efficacy but was associated with less weight gain (mean Δweight: -0.83kg, 95% CrI: -1.59, -0.08) and a lower probability of somnolence (mOR: 0.33, 95% CrI: 0.11, 0.82). Results for other outcomes were not statistically meaningful. CONCLUSIONS: This network meta-analysis suggests that lurasidone is more efficacious than aripiprazole and ziprasidone and has similar efficacy compared to quetiapine (with fewer effects on weight and somnolence than quetiapine) for the management of bipolar depression.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2016-05, ISPOR 2016, Washington DC, USA

Value in Health, Vol. 19, No. 3 (May 2016)

Code

PMH8

Topic

Clinical Outcomes

Topic Subcategory

Comparative Effectiveness or Efficacy

Disease

Mental Health

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×