CHARACTERIZATION OF ON-LABEL AND OFF-LABEL USE OF TESTOSTERONE AMONG THE COMMERCIALLY INSURED POPULATION IN THE UNITED STATES

Author(s)

Shewale AR1, Bhandari NR2, Kathe N1, Hammond D1, Painter JT1
1University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA, 2University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences College of Pharmacy, Little Rock, AR, USA

OBJECTIVES: Testosterone sales increased approximately 500% from 1993 to 2001. Despite this increase, only 5 percent of men with hypogonadism received appropriate treatment. Our study aimed to compare the characteristics of on-label and off-label testosterone use. METHODS: Characteristics of on-label, off-label, and indeterminate use were retrieved from IMS LifeLink Plus for 2006-2013 and compared. On-label and off-label indications and contraindications were identified using validated ICD-9-CM codes. Demographics, prescriber and payer types, comorbidities, contraindications, and off-label and on-label use were compared between user groups using Chi-square tests. RESULTS: A cohort of 48,493 incident testosterone users met our inclusion-exclusion criteria of which 12, 728 (26.3%) were on-label users, 5694 (11.7%) were off-label users and 30071 (62.0%) were indeterminate users. Females contributed a very small percentage among the on-label users (0.5%) but had a significant proportion among the off-label users (24.6%) and indeterminate users (15.7%). More on-label than off-label prescriptions were prescribed by general practice/family practice physicians (11.2% vs. 9.4%, p<0.0001). Conversely, more off-label than on-label prescriptions were written by OB/GYN (9% vs. 0.4%, p<0.0001). The most common on-label use was hypogonadism (99.8%), whereas the most common off-label use was decreased libido (53.4%). Prior prostate specific antigen testing was performed more frequently preceding on-label use (73.92%) as compared to off-label (48.3%) and indeterminate use (45.03%; p<0.0001). Similarly, serum testosterone concentration testing was also performed more frequently preceding on-label use (88.84%) as compared to off-label (75.08%) and indeterminate use (60.48%; p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Characteristics of on-label and off-label users significantly differed in the commercially insured US population. Specific differences included gender, practitioner type, and prior testing.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2016-05, ISPOR 2016, Washington DC, USA

Value in Health, Vol. 19, No. 3 (May 2016)

Code

PHP21

Topic

Health Policy & Regulatory, Health Service Delivery & Process of Care

Topic Subcategory

Prescribing Behavior, Pricing Policy & Schemes, Treatment Patterns and Guidelines

Disease

Diabetes/Endocrine/Metabolic Disorders, Multiple Diseases, Reproductive and Sexual Health

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×