TREATMENT PATTERNS AMONG ELDERLY METASTATIC COLORECTAL CANCER PATIENTS - A SEER-MEDICARE ANALYSIS

Author(s)

Parikh RC, Du XL, Morgan RO, Lairson DR
UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER AT HOUSTON, HOUSTON, TX, USA

OBJECTIVES: Colorectal cancer (CRC) ranks third in prevalence and cancer deaths among all cancers in the United States. Nearly one fourth of CRC patients are diagnosed at metastatic stage (mCRC), which has a poor prognosis and an overall survival of 5% to 8% at five years. Over the last decade multiple chemotherapies and targeted biologics have been approved for mCRC and patients receive an array of these treatments in various combinations, with limited evidence. The study examines current usage patterns by line of treatment for elderly mCRC patients. METHODS: A retrospective observational cohort study was conducted for mCRC patients diagnosed from January 2004 through December 2009 using the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results-Medicare linked database. Systemic chemotherapies and targeted biologics currently approved by the Food and Drug Administration for treatment of mCRC patients were included. The first three lines of treatment administered to elderly mCRC patients were empirically identified. RESULTS: The most common first line of treatment for mCRC patients (n=4,603) was bevacizumab + fluorouracil + oxaliplatin (24%), followed by fluorouracil + oxaliplatin (23%). Bevacizumab + fluorouracil + oxaliplatin (18%) and bevacizumab + fluorouracil + irinotecan (15%) were the most administered second line of treatments, while cetuximab + irinotecan and bevacizumab + fluorouracil + irinotecan were the commonly administered third line regimens (15% each). Of 4,603 mCRC patients who received first a line of treatment, 2,708 (59%) continued to receive a second line of treatment, 1,480 (32%) received a third line of treatment, and 1,895 (41%) did not receive any further line of treatment.  CONCLUSIONS: In accordance with current recommendations and previous studies, fluorouracil + oxaliplatin/irinotecan based regimens with bevacizumab were the most common first and second line treatments. Further exploration of the comparative effectiveness of line of treatments sequencing may yield important information for improving the quality of cancer treatment.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2015-05, ISPOR 2015, Philadelphia, PA, USA

Value in Health, Vol. 18, No. 3 (May 2015)

Code

PCN184

Topic

Health Service Delivery & Process of Care

Topic Subcategory

Treatment Patterns and Guidelines

Disease

Oncology

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×