SURVEY OF PHYSICIANS REGARDING APPLICATION AND UTILITY OF PHARMACOGENOMICS RESULTS IN THE MANAGEMENT OF CHRONIC MEDICAL CONDITIONS

Author(s)

Delgado A1, Villarreal SM1, Gurnani P2, Rosenblatt K2, Koeller JM1
1University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA, 2CompanionDx, Houston, TX, USA

OBJECTIVES: To describe the application and perceived utility of pharmacogenomic recommendations among physicians managing a cohort of Medicare patients’ chronic medical conditions.  METHODS: From January 1 through April 30, 2013, genetic results were reviewed from Medicare patients. Demographic data included patients’ date of birth, age, ethnicity, gender, medication count, ICD-9-CM diagnosis codes, insurance information, and current medications. Patients’ physicians were provided with a standardized report, including CYP3A4, CYP3A5, CYP2D6, CYP2C19, CYP2C9, VKORC1, MTHFR1298, MTHFR677, Factor V, and Factor II genotypes, phenotypes, and individualized clinical recommendations. Physicians’ responses to a survey regarding the use of the recommendations were then summarized. RESULTS: One hundred and ninety-five patients, with a mean age of 66 years (59% female) and an average of 8.7 medications were reviewed. Seventy-seven percent (144/187) of physicians’ responses indicated that the reports were received in a timely manner and 99% (192/194) indicated that they were actionable and easy to understand. Forty-one percent (77/186) made a dosing change, 52% (99/192) a medication change, and 10% (14/137) a medication therapy duration change. Twenty-five percent (46/183) indicated that without the report, no changes would have been made, while 38% reflected that their clinical assessment alone would have led to therapy modification. CONCLUSIONS: Despite timely receipt and ease of understanding, physicians appear reluctant to utilize pharmacogenomic recommendations from an outside source to make changes to medication dosing, regimen, or duration for their patients.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2015-05, ISPOR 2015, Philadelphia, PA, USA

Value in Health, Vol. 18, No. 3 (May 2015)

Code

PND65

Topic

Health Service Delivery & Process of Care, Real World Data & Information Systems

Topic Subcategory

Health & Insurance Records Systems, Health Care Research, Hospital and Clinical Practices, Quality of Care Measurement, Treatment Patterns and Guidelines

Disease

Multiple Diseases, Rare and Orphan Diseases

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×