META-ANALYSIS FOR THE EVALUATION OF MULTIPLE SURROGATE ENDPOINTS
Author(s)
Bujkiewicz S, Spata E, Thompson JR, Abrams K
University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
METHODS:
Meta-analytical methods for the evaluation of multiple surrogate endpoints are developed. The modelling techniques, developed in Bayesian framework, take into account measurement errors of the treatment effects on all outcomes and the correlations between them. Methods developed are applied to a case study in multiple sclerosis (MS) where the relapse rate (RR) and the number of active MRI lesions (MRI) are the candidate surrogate endpoints and the final outcome is the disability progression (DP). Surrogate endpoints are evaluated by assessing their predictive value in the cross-validation procedure.
RESULTS: Applying bivariate model showed a good association between effects on RR and DP. Extending to trivariate case to include the effect on MRI increased the precision of the association and reduced the heterogeneity. The cross validation gave better predictions, by reducing the intervals on average by 14%, when including multiple surrogate endpoints.
CONCLUSIONS: The methods used for combining evidence on multiple surrogate outcomes can lead to more precise predictions of the effect on final outcome. Inclusion of multiple surrogate endpoints may lead to a more substantial gain in precision in other disease areas, hence leading to faster HTA decisions.
Conference/Value in Health Info
Value in Health, Vol. 18, No. 3 (May 2015)
Code
PRM75
Topic
Methodological & Statistical Research
Topic Subcategory
Confounding, Selection Bias Correction, Causal Inference, Modeling and simulation
Disease
Neurological Disorders