INCREASED RATES OF SELF MONITORING OF BLOOD GLUCOSE TRANSLATES TO BETTER MARGINAL EFFECTS ON HBA1C CONTROL

Author(s)

Agiro A1, Xie Y1, DeVries A1, Bowman K2, Carlisle SG3
1HealthCore, Wilmington, DE, USA, 2Anthem, Baltimore, MD, USA, 3Anthem, Woodland Hills, CA, USA

OBJECTIVES: Despite numerous studies highlighting the importance of HbA1c control, literature quantifying the marginal effect of self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) on HbA1c control is somewhat limited. Recognizing this knowledge gap, this study assessed the association between increased use of testing strips and glycemic control, taking into account insulin regimen, type I/II status, and other patient-level characteristics.  METHODS: Patient inclusion and exclusion criteria were adapted from HEDIS Comprehensive Diabetes Care guidelines. Commercially enrolled patients on insulin regimen (basal, bolus, or pre-mixed) with at least one diabetic strip fill between the ages of 18 to 75 years were identified from the HealthCore Integrated Research Database®. Continuous enrollment for 12 months pre/post the earliest testing strip fill (‘index’) was required. Clinical outcome was defined as most current HbA1c lab value within 1 year post-index period. Using average marginal effects (AME) analysis with bootstrapping, we estimated the likelihood of patient's control (HbA1c < 8.0%) as number of testing strip fills increased, adjusting for age, gender, insulin regimen, and other variables.  RESULTS: Within this population, 45.8% of patients were unable to achieve control rates of <8% during the study period.  However, patients with higher fill rates (>=4 fills) were more likely to achieve control (60.9%) relative to a 44.0% control rate among those with low fill rates (< 4 fills). Using the AME analysis, each increase in fills was associated with a 2.5% increase in achieving control (AME: 2.5%, 95% C.I.: 2.1% - 2.8%, p<.001). The marginal effect between strip fills and HbA1c control was greater among type I patients (AME: 3.5%, 95% C.I.: 2.5% – 3.5%, p<.001).   CONCLUSIONS: We found a statistically significant AME between testing strip fills and glucose control.  These findings highlight the importance of efforts to encourage better SMBG among patients on insulin, with implications for improved patient outcomes and long term cost savings.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2015-05, ISPOR 2015, Philadelphia, PA, USA

Value in Health, Vol. 18, No. 3 (May 2015)

Code

PMD61

Topic

Health Service Delivery & Process of Care, Patient-Centered Research

Topic Subcategory

Health Care Research, Patient Behavior and Incentives, Treatment Patterns and Guidelines

Disease

Diabetes/Endocrine/Metabolic Disorders

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×