ESTIMATING THE COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF VORTIOXETINE VERSUS DESVENLAFAXINE AS FIRST LINE THERAPY FOR MILD TO MODERATE MAJOR DEPRESSIVE DISORDER IN REMITTED PATIENTS

Author(s)

Keyloun KR, Devine B
University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA

OBJECTIVES: The primary objective was to estimate incremental cost-effectiveness of vortioxetine, a serotonin modulator and simulator (SMS) versus desvenlafaxine, a serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (SNRI), as potential first line medications for treatment of mild or moderate major depression. The clinical benefit of a SMS may be in faster onset and shorter time to remission. Evidence suggests vortioxetine causes fewer adverse drug events (ADEs) than desvenlafaxine, which has implications for discontinuation of therapy. METHODS: A decision tree was constructed to model the cost effectiveness of these two agents from the societal perspective. Parameters were obtained from published clinical trial data, a meta-analysis using indirect treatment comparison, observational studies, preference elicitation studies, and cost estimates from Average Wholesale Prices for medications and claims analyses for cost of medical care. The model assumed that patients achieved remission. The time horizon was 48 weeks and included opportunities to switch medication therapy at 8 weeks and relapse at 24 weeks. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were calculated using the number of discontinuations averted, relapses averted, and quality adjusted life years (QALYs) gained as outcomes. One-way sensitivity analyses were conducted. RESULTS: The ICER was $77,800 per QALY gained, $59,500 per relapse averted, and $58,500 per averted discontinuation due to ADEs. The parameter that was least robust was a utility value of maintenance therapy for vortioxetine or desvenlafaxine applied to weeks 8-48 (0.80, range: 0.78-0.82; 0.76, range 0.74-0.78, respectively). Time to remission was varied from 6-10 weeks. A shorter time to remission for vortioxetine provided modest improvements in the ICER while a longer time to remission increased cost over the point estimate of $77,800 per QALY gained ($69,000-$88,900 per QALY gained, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Model results suggest that there is value in investing in vortioxetine over desvenlafaxine. A potentially faster time to remission for vortioxetine would result in increased value.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2015-05, ISPOR 2015, Philadelphia, PA, USA

Value in Health, Vol. 18, No. 3 (May 2015)

Code

PMH39

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis

Disease

Mental Health

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×