EFFECTIVENESS AND COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF CATHETER-DIRECTED THROMBOLYSIS IN MASSIVE PULMONARY EMBOLISM

Author(s)

Kostyuk A1, Akanov A2, Garkalov K1
1Kazakh Medical University for Continuing Education, Astana, Kazakhstan, 2Astana Medical University, Astana, Kazakhstan

OBJECTIVES: Massive pulmonary embolism (PE) is a life-threatening condition associated with a high incidence of fatalities comparable to that of acute myocardial infarction. A variety of treatment modalities have been used in patients with massive PE, which include systemic anticoagulation, catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) and etc. METHODS: A Markov model was constructed to determine the costs and benefits of CDT with urokinase and CDT with alteplase. The time horizon of the model was lifetime, and a monthly cycle length was adopted.  A review of the literature was undertaken to identify the primary studies used to populate the decision model. Direct medical costs were assessed from the payer perspective in the Kazakhstan and analyzed using sensitivity analyses. A Monte Carlo analysis with 1000 patients was performed to obtain mean. RESULTS: Compared with heparin, CDT was associated with a significant reduction of overall mortality. This reduction was not statistically significant after exclusion of studies including highrisk PE. However, major haemorrhage and fatal or intracranial bleeding were significantly more frequent among patients receiving CDT. The multi-way sensitivity analysis showed that CDT was cost-effective only under specific scenarios. The expected costs per patient were $1,656 for CDT with urokinase and $990 for CDT with alteplase (difference $666). The mean cost-effectiveness ratio was $235,950 per CDT with urokinase  and  $487,229 for CDT with alteplase. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that CDT with urokinase was more effective and less costly (dominant) in 23% of all simulations.  CONCLUSIONS: The analysis showed that CDT might be cost-effective in sub-groups of patients at high risk of death from PE.The use of CDT with urokinase for the treatment of haemodynamically stable patients with PE was more cost-effective than CDT with alteplase in the Kazakhstan. The fact that when using alteplase have a higher risk of hemorrhage than with urokinase is also preferences for the use of urokinase for CDT.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2015-05, ISPOR 2015, Philadelphia, PA, USA

Value in Health, Vol. 18, No. 3 (May 2015)

Code

PCV17

Topic

Clinical Outcomes

Topic Subcategory

Comparative Effectiveness or Efficacy

Disease

Cardiovascular Disorders

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×