DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF A U.S. ADMINISTRATIVE CLAIMS-BASED ALGORITHM TO CLASSIFY PATIENTS WITH TYPE 2 DIABETES MELLITUS INTO RENAL IMPAIRMENT STAGES
Author(s)
Johnston S1, Sheehan J2, Riehle E1, Cappell KA3, Varker H1, Anzalone D4, Ghannam A2, Kalsekar I4
1Truven Health Analytics, Bethesda, MD, USA, 2AstraZeneca, Fort Washington, PA, USA, 3Truven Health Analytics, Ann Arbor, MI, USA, 4AstraZeneca, Wilmington, DE, USA
OBJECTIVES: The validity of diagnosis/procedure coding for determining the severity of renal impairment is unknown. This retrospective, observational study developed an administrative claims-based algorithm which classified patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) into renal impairment stages using estimated glomerular filtration rate/1.73 sq M by MDRD equation (eGFR) as the measure for renal function. METHODS: The data source was U.S. administrative claims collected from among a sample of 35,624 patients ≥18 years of age who, during the period from 1/1/2012-12/31/2012, had ≥1 laboratory result for eGFR, ≥2 medical claims with a diagnosis code for T2DM, continuous insurance enrollment, and no medical claims with a diagnosis/procedure code for type 1 diabetes, gestational diabetes, or pregnancy. The sample was divided into two equal random samples: a test set and validation set. Among the test set, four logistic regressions were fit modeling Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative-defined renal impairment stages (eGFR <15, <30, <60, and <90) as a function of age, sex, and 25 binary indicators for the presence of medical claims with renal impairment-related diagnosis/procedure codes. From each regression, a predicted probability was obtained for the validation set and performance of the algorithm was tested (e.g., by ROC analysis) at varying probability cutoff classification thresholds. RESULTS: In the validation set, the percentage of patients correctly classified by the test set algorithm using a standard probability cutoff=0.5 was 75.9% for eGFR <90, 82.1% for <60, 97.3% <30, and 99.3% for <15; in the test set, these same percentages deviated by less than 1 percentage point. Model C-statistics ranged from 0.79 for eGFR <90 to 0.89 for eGFR <15. Sensitivity/specificity varied considerably by selected probability cutoffs. CONCLUSIONS: This novel, replicable, administrative claims-based algorithm should prove useful to diabetes researchers who need to classify patients’ renal impairment stage in the absence of detailed eGFR data.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2015-05, ISPOR 2015, Philadelphia, PA, USA
Value in Health, Vol. 18, No. 3 (May 2015)
Code
PRM1
Topic
Clinical Outcomes
Topic Subcategory
Clinical Outcomes Assessment
Disease
Urinary/Kidney Disorders