COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS OF IPX066 IN ADVANCED PARKINSON'S DISEASE

Author(s)

Arnold RJ1, Frasco MA1, Layton A1, Rustay NR2, Chen S2
1Quorum Consulting, San Francisco, CA, USA, 2Impax Laboratories, Inc., Hayward, CA, USA

OBJECTIVES: Parkinson’s disease (PD) is a progressive disease associated with substantial economic and societal burden.  Immediate-release (IR) carbidopa-levodopa (CD-LD) is the gold standard in treatment for advanced PD patients.  However, effectiveness of IR CD-LD diminishes with long-term treatment and is associated with increased “off” time (re-emergence of PD symptoms) and the advent of motor complications.  CD-LD plus entacapone (CL+E) has produced some clinical improvement over IR CD-LD alone. IPX066 is an extended-release oral formulation of CD-LD designed to address some of the limitations of IR CD-LD by rapidly attaining and maintaining therapeutic LD concentrations for a prolonged duration.  The aim of the study was to evaluate the comparative cost-effectiveness of IPX066 against CL+E. METHODS: A Markov model was developed comparing IPX066 with branded and generic CL+E in the US market.  Health states included ≤ 25% “off” time, > 25% “off” time, and dead.  The model simulated a hypothetical patient’s progression over a 5-year period through these health states, with a 6-month Markov cycle length. Outcomes evaluated were total direct costs, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER).  Dosing and efficacy data from a Phase 3 study comparing IPX066 and CL+E, average wholesale acquisition drug costs (RedBook), and published literature were utilized for this evaluation.  Non-2014 costs were inflated to reflect the 2014 value using the medical component of the Consumer Price Index.  The discount rate employed was 3%. RESULTS: IPX066 was dominant over both branded and generic CL+E therapies, with ICERs of (-$166,044) and (-$75,920), respectively.  On average, patients who received IPX066 experienced a 5.1% increase in QALYs (2.90) compared with patients who did not receive IPX066 (2.76).  IPX066 dominated the other two therapies throughout multiple sensitivity analyses, driven largely by improved effectiveness of IPX066. CONCLUSIONS: IPX066 is likely to be a cost-effective therapy in patients with advanced PD.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2015-05, ISPOR 2015, Philadelphia, PA, USA

Value in Health, Vol. 18, No. 3 (May 2015)

Code

PND31

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis

Disease

Neurological Disorders

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×