COST – EFFICACY STUDY FOR IPILIMUMAB IN THE CHILEAN MARKET
Author(s)
Rovegno M1, Llanos C2, Galleguillos S2, Garrido Lecca S3
1Departamento de Medicina Intensiva, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Católica de Chile., Santiago, Chile, 2IAS, Facultad de Economía y Negocios, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile, 3Bristol-Myers Squibb, Lima, Peru
OBJECTIVES: To establish the cost per month of mean overall survival improvement, in Chilean patients treated with ipilimumab, from a third payer perspective. METHODS: We compared ipilimumab treatment for advance melanoma with other drugs for advanced cancer that met inclusion criteria including: (1) positive phase three study with overall survival as primary or secondary aim, (2) authorized by Chilean government agency, and (3) verifiable price in the private market. We performed a cost – efficacy analysis, using local prices obtained from published local sources to calculate an average cost to progression. Time to progression was obtained from published clinical trials. Mean overall survival improvement was used as the efficacy metric. Cost – efficacy outputs were plotted and compared. All costs are presented in 2014 USD. Additionally, a survey to Chilean oncology specialist was designed to obtain qualitative information about their experience(s) with ipilimumab for the treatment of metastatic melanoma patients in Chile. RESULTS: Nineteen drugs met inclusion criteria with 28 advance cancer indications. The average cost per month of mean survival improvement was estimated at $24,802 (range 1,737 – $91,256). We estimated the cost per additional month of mean survival improvement at $13,122 and $14.843 for first and second line treatment with ipilimumab respectively. Based on the survey, local expert opinion unanimously stated that ipilimumab is the best treatment alternative for patients with advanced melanoma. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with other innovative drugs for the treatment of advanced cancers, the cost per mean survival improvement with ipilimumab was below the average market value and may provide good value for money from a third payer perspective in Chile. Based on the survey, specialists noted ipilimumab as the best treatment option for Chilean patient with advanced melanoma.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2015-05, ISPOR 2015, Philadelphia, PA, USA
Value in Health, Vol. 18, No. 3 (May 2015)
Code
PCN70
Topic
Economic Evaluation
Topic Subcategory
Cost/Cost of Illness/Resource Use Studies
Disease
Oncology