COMPARISON OF CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS OF TREATMENTS FOR PSEUDOBULBAR AFFECT (PBA) – RESULTS FROM A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
Author(s)
Baculea S1, Barcena L1, Singh M1, Mealing S2, Yonan C3
1ICON Clinical Research (UK) Ltd., Oxford, UK, 2ICON Health Economics and Epidemiology, Oxford, UK, 3Avanir Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Aliso Viejo, CA, USA
OBJECTIVES: PBA is a neurologic disorder characterized by involuntary, uncontrollable laughing and/or crying episodes that are often incongruent with the patient’s internal emotional state; PBA has also been called pathological laughing/crying, emotionalism, etc. Until FDA approval of dextromethorphan/quinidine (DM/Q) in 2010, multiple agents including antidepressants, antipsychotics, dopamine agonists and sedatives were used off-label for the management of PBA symptoms. We conducted a systematic review of therapies (licensed and unlicensed) for PBA symptoms to evaluate their relative clinical effectiveness METHODS: Databases: Medline, Medline in process, Embase and the Cochrane central register of controlled trials; conference abstracts were searched in Embase. Study type: RCTs and non-RCTs in adult patients with PBA/PBA-like symptoms (pathological laughing/crying, emotionalism, etc). Interventions: DM/Q, antidepressants, antipsychotics, dextromethorphan and quinidine alone. Outcome measures: change from baseline in various measures of PBA/emotionalism symptoms or symptom burden (NPI, SF-36, PRS scores and the caregiver strain index (CSI)). RESULTS: Nine RCTs and three observational studies were included. Among off-label drugs, six RCTs of 3 SSRIs and 2 TCAs showed improvements in disparate PBA symptom measures, only 1 used a validated symptom measure. These studies were small (N=6-28) using mostly stroke patients. They were heterogeneous on how they defined/diagnosed PBA and varied in duration (1.4-24 weeks). As such, no formal evidence synthesis was possible. Three RCTs and one open label trial investigating DM/Q included a well-defined and diverse PBA patient population, showing statistically significant improvements in a range of validated clinical and HRQoL outcomes relevant for the treatment of PBA. CONCLUSIONS: The evidence base for off-label agents used for treatment of PBA is limited, relying on small often uncontrolled studies showing ill-defined treatment effects and little or no safety tracking. DM/Q is the only treatment for PBA that has demonstrated efficacy in well-conducted clinical trials in patients with varied neurological disorders.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2015-05, ISPOR 2015, Philadelphia, PA, USA
Value in Health, Vol. 18, No. 3 (May 2015)
Code
PND10
Topic
Clinical Outcomes
Topic Subcategory
Comparative Effectiveness or Efficacy
Disease
Neurological Disorders