COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF PRESCRIPTION UTILIZATION AND COSTS OF LURASIDONE AND ARIPIPRAZOLE- A PHARMACY-DATABASE STUDY

Author(s)

Ng-Mak DS1, Brook RA2, Rajagopalan K1, Taitel MS3, Lou Y3, Loebel A4
1Sunovion Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Marlborough, MA, USA, 2Better Health Worldwide, Newfoundland, NJ, USA, 3Walgreen Co, Deerfield, IL, USA, 4Sunovion Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Fort Lee, NJ, USA

OBJECTIVES: Pharmacy databases can yield important information about drug utilization and costs. This study sought to examine changes in prescription utilization and costs among atypical antipsychotic (AAP) subjects initiating lurasidone or aripiprazole therapy.  METHODS: Adults filling lurasidone or aripiprazole prescriptions from 2/3/2011—6/30/2013 were identified in the Walgreens pharmacy-database.  Treatment-naive monotherapy subjects (no AAP prescriptions before-and-after index prescription) with ≥12-months pre-/post-index continuous enrollment were eligible. Lurasidone subjects were compared to a 1:1 matched random sample of aripiprazole subjects.  Baseline demographics and health-insurance status were compared between cohorts. Mental-health prescriptions (antianxiety agents, antidepressants, antipsychotics, psychotherapeutic, and neurologic agents) were identified using Generic Product Identifier for the National Drug Code numbers on pharmacy claims. Differences in mean changes (post-pre) in all-cause prescription fills all-cause prescription costs, mental-health prescription fills and mental-health costs were compared using t-tests.   RESULTS: Each cohort included 4,595 subjects (lurasidone vs aripiprazole: 69.3% vs 72.2% female, mean ages 41.0 vs 43.4 years). Most subjects were commercially-insured (39.9% vs 48.6%), followed by State-Medicaid (24.4% vs 18.7%), Medicare-Part-D (22.8% vs 18.7%), and Managed-Medicaid (6.8% vs 5.6%). Lurasidone subjects had lower 30-day equivalent co-pays ($42.02 vs $56.63). Subjects were more likely to be prescribed lurasidone  by psychiatrists (78.0% vs 57.3%) and less likely by general-practitioners (3.1% vs 23.0%). Overall, lower mean increases in all-cause prescription fills (11.3 vs 12.3;p=.09) and mental-health prescription fills (7.2 vs 8.0;p<.01) were observed for lurasidone than aripiprazole subjects. Additionally, mean differences in all-cause prescription costs ($2,388 vs $3,080;p<.01) and mental-health prescription costs ($2,123 vs $2,810;p<.01) were lower for lurasidone than aripiprazole subjects. Similar patterns of mean changes in prescription utilization and costs were found in commercial, Medicaid and Medicare subjects. CONCLUSIONS: In this national-US pharmacy-database analysis comparing subjects initiating branded AAPs, lurasidone subjects had fewer mean changes in all-cause and mental-health prescriptions and lower mean increases in associated costs than aripiprazole subjects.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2015-05, ISPOR 2015, Philadelphia, PA, USA

Value in Health, Vol. 18, No. 3 (May 2015)

Code

PMH22

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis

Disease

Mental Health

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×