A COST-EFFECTIVENESS AND BUDGET IMPACT ANALYSIS OF FIDAXOMICIN FOR TREATING CLOSTRIDIUM DIFFICILE PATIENTS IN GERMANY

Author(s)

Watt M1, McCrea C2, Johal S3, Posnett J4, Nazir J1
1Astellas, Surrey, UK, 2Heron Commercialization, London, UK, 3Parexel International, London, UK, 4PAREXEL International, London, UK

OBJECTIVES: Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) is a debilitating illness. In two phase III trials fidaxomicin produced comparable initial cure rates, significantly lower recurrence rates (p<0.005) and significantly higher sustained cure rates (p=0.001) versus vancomycin. This cost-effectiveness and budget impact model analysed the costs and outcomes of vancomycin and fidaxomicin for treatment of CDI in Germany. METHODS: The model was a Markov cohort simulation, with 10-day cycle length.  The analysis timescale was either 40 days (hospital perspective) or 1 year (payer perspective).  Clinical inputs included : 30-day CDI-attributable mortality, probability of clinical cure and 30-day probability of recurrence after end of treatment. The first-line treatment is either Dificlir (€1300) or vancomycin (€61). Second line treatment is user defined, and in the base case is vancomycin. Third line treatment is a rescue treatment (€1500), assumed to have 100% cure rate. The model is populated with cost data for Germany. Drug costs are based on list prices, and the costs of hospitalisation are DRG tariff rates; Cost per day of CDI treated on a general ward (€348). A deterministic sensitivity analysis was carried out to test the robustness of the model outcomes. The cost-effectiveness of six CDI patient subgroups was also analysed based on the two fidaxomicin clinical trials’ results. RESULTS: The outcomes of the model for All Patient group: incremental cost per QALY gained €40,807, cost per recurrence avoided €2,068, and cost per bed-day saved €110. For the All Patient group fidaxomicin reduced the number of recurrences by 49%. Fewer recurrences led to a reduction in attributable deaths, a gain in life years; an improvement in quality of life; and a reduction in the number of bed-days.   CONCLUSIONS: First-line fidaxomicin is likely to be a cost-effective treatment option, compared to vancomycin at a willingness to pay threshold of €50,000 per QALY gained.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2015-05, ISPOR 2015, Philadelphia, PA, USA

Value in Health, Vol. 18, No. 3 (May 2015)

Code

PIN33

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Budget Impact Analysis, Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis

Disease

Infectious Disease (non-vaccine)

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×