SURVIVAL DIFFERENCES IN HEART FAILURE PATIENTS WITH AND WITHOUT IRON DEFICIENCY/ANEMIA AND BY ORAL AND INTRAVENOUS IRON TREATMENT
Author(s)
Altevers J1, Jacob C1, Maas C1, Krinke K1, Barck I2, Hardt T2, Braun S1
1Xcenda GmbH, Hannover, Germany, 2Vifor Pharma Deutschland GmbH, München, Germany
OBJECTIVES: Iron deficiency/anemia (ID/A) are frequent comorbidities in heart failure (HF), associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Treatment of ID/A includes oral and intravenous iron, but little is known about the effect of different treatments on mortality. This study aimed to determine survival differences between HF patients without ID/A and with untreated ID/A and differences between various iron treatments in a real-world setting, stratified by New York Heart Association (NYHA) classes. METHODS: A retrospective, matched cohort analysis was conducted using the InGef research database containing German claims data. HF and ID/A were identified by ICD-10-GM codes and iron treatment by ATC codes in 2013. HF patients without ID/A and with untreated ID/A were matched 1:1. Patients with HF and ID/A without iron treatment, with oral or intravenous iron treatment were matched 1:1:1. Matching parameters included age, gender, NYHA class, and baseline costs. Survival was analyzed in a 1-year timeframe using Kaplan-Meier estimators and log-rank tests. RESULTS: In total, 3,048 HF patients with untreated ID/A were matched to HF patients without ID/A. HF patients with untreated ID/A had a highly significantly lower survival probability than patients without ID/A (p<0.0001). The 1:1:1 matching resulted in 352 triplets. Patients with oral iron treatment showed a significantly higher survival probability than patients without iron treatment in NYHA 3 (p=0.0241). Comparing patients with HF and ID/A receiving intravenous iron to those without iron treatment revealed significant differences in favor of intravenous iron treatment for NYHA classes 2 (p=0.0114), 3 (p=0.0111) and pooled 1-4 (p=0.0046). Comparison of oral and intravenous iron treatment favored intravenous iron treatment in NYHA 2 patients (p=0.0211) and pooled NYHA 1-4 patients (p=0.1276). CONCLUSIONS: Real-world evidence showed survival disadvantages in HF patients with comorbid ID/A, irrespective of NYHA class. Iron treatment, in particular intravenous iron, is associated with an improved survival probability.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2017-11, ISPOR Europe 2017, Glasgow, Scotland
Value in Health, Vol. 20, No. 9 (October 2017)
Code
PCV34
Topic
Clinical Outcomes
Topic Subcategory
Relating Intermediate to Long-term Outcomes
Disease
Cardiovascular Disorders