SOCIETAL COSTS OF ER+/HER2- ADVANCED OR METASTATIC BREAST CANCER IN POST-MENOPAUSAL WOMEN IN THE UNITED KINGDOM
Author(s)
Bermingham S1, Schmid P2, Forster F3, Cornic L3, Theti D4, Smith A4
1Symmetron Ltd, Toronto, ON, Canada, 2Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK, 3Symmetron Ltd, Elstree, UK, 4Pfizer Ltd, Surrey, UK
OBJECTIVES: To estimate indirect and societal costs for post-menopausal women with HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer (mBC) in the United Kingdom (UK), and how disease progression impacts these costs. METHODS: We systematically identified studies that assessed the impact of mBC on activities of daily living and lost productivity (ADL/LP). Key ADL/LP categories identified were early mortality, productivity loss, replacement housework, childcare, informal care, lost leisure time, and transportation. UK-specific data were preferred, with data sought from other countries where not available. Costs were estimated in GBP, per woman, per month, for two ‘health states’: stable and progressed disease. RESULTS: Of 35 identified studies, three were conducted in the UK and one pan-European. Due to the paucity of UK data, ADL/LP data from other OECD countries were also used. Indirect costs for women with stable HR+/HER2- mBC were calculated at £2,179 per month. Indirect costs in the progressed HR+/HER2- mBC state were calculated as £2,597 (Scenario A) or £2,990 (Scenario B) per month. These scenarios assumed either: (A) ADL/LP was the same in the progressed state and the stable state, if state-specific ADL/LP was not reported; or (B) women in the progressed state suffered a higher ADL/LP impact than in stable disease (by a factor derived from literature and expert opinion). Total indirect costs from metastatic diagnosis to death were £59,819 (Scenario A) or £66,352 (Scenario B) per woman. CONCLUSIONS: We estimated that stable disease incurs £418 to £811 less indirect cost per woman per month than progressed disease. To our knowledge, no previous study estimates the progression-related indirect and societal costs of HR+/HER2- mBC in the UK. There is a lack of data regarding the impact of mBC on ADL/LP; more sophisticated data collection is needed to better characterise the financial burden of HR+/HER2- mBC for policy makers, patients and carers.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2017-11, ISPOR Europe 2017, Glasgow, Scotland
Value in Health, Vol. 20, No. 9 (October 2017)
Code
PCN86
Topic
Economic Evaluation
Topic Subcategory
Cost/Cost of Illness/Resource Use Studies
Disease
Oncology, Reproductive and Sexual Health