REAL WORLD COMPARISON OF PERSISTENCE AND ADHERENCE AMONG BIOLOGIC NAÏVE PATIENTS INITIATING APREMILAST OR BIOLOGICS FOR THE TREATMENT OF PSORIASIS IN THE UNITED STATES
Author(s)
Feldman SR1, Bonafede MM2, Pelletier C3, Mehta R3, Brouillette M2, Smith D2, Wilson KL2, Ni Q3
1Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA, 2Truven Health Analytics, an IBM Company, Cambridge, MA, USA, 3Celgene Corporation, Summit, NJ, USA
OBJECTIVES: To compare adherence and treatment persistence over 12 months among biologic naïve adults initiating apremilast or biologics for the treatment of psoriasis (PsO) in the United States. METHODS: Adult PsO patients initiating apremilast or biologics (index date) were identified in the January 2013 - June 2016 Truven Health MarketScan Research Databases. Patients were required to be apremilast/biologic naïve at index; 12 months of pre- and post-index continuous enrollment were required. Biologic users were matched up to 2:1 to apremilast users. Treatment persistence was defined as continuous treatment without (1) a >60-day gap in therapy, or (2) a switch to a different PsO treatment during the 12-month post-index period. Patients were adherent if their medication possession ratio (MPR) was ≥80% while persistent on the index treatment. RESULTS: Matched samples of 703 PsO patients initiating apremilast and 1378 PsO patients initiating biologics were evaluated (mean age 49 years, approximately 50% female, mean Charlson score 0.4). Treatment persistence at 12 months was similar for PsO patients initiating apremilast compared to patients initiating biologics (44.4% vs 44.6%; p=0.914). Patients initiating apremilast were less likely to be non-persistent because of switching (6% vs 11%; p=0.003) and more likely to be non-persistent because of a >60-day gap in therapy (94% vs 89%; p=0.003) compared to patients initiating biologics. Persistence-based MPRs were similar for patients initiating apremilast compared to patients initiating biologics (0.86 vs 0.86; p=0.654) as were adherence rates (73% and 74%; p=0.516). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment persistence at 12 months and adherence were similar for biologic naïve PsO patients initiating apremilast or biologics in a large U.S. administrative claims database. Non-persistence due to switching was significantly lower for biologic naïve PsO patients initiating apremilast. Future research should describe the healthcare utilization and cost outcomes associated with these treatments.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2017-11, ISPOR Europe 2017, Glasgow, Scotland
Value in Health, Vol. 20, No. 9 (October 2017)
Code
PSY122
Topic
Economic Evaluation, Health Service Delivery & Process of Care
Topic Subcategory
Cost/Cost of Illness/Resource Use Studies, Prescribing Behavior
Disease
Systemic Disorders/Conditions