PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES OF THE EQ-5D-5L IN PATIENTS WITH MAJOR DEPRESSION DISORDER

Author(s)

Bilbao A1, García-Perez L2, Retolaza-Balsategui A3, Mendezona-Peña JI4, Estebanez S5, Vazquez de la Torre-Escalera P6, Ruiz-Quintanal L7, Martín-Fernández J8
1Research Unit, Basurto University Hospital (Osakidetza) – Health Service Research Network on Chronic Diseases (REDISSEC), Bilbao, Spain, 2Fundación Canaria de Investigación Sanitaria (FUNCANIS) – REDISSEC, Tenerife, Spain, 3Basauri Mental Health Center (Osakidetza) – REDISSEC, Basauri, Spain, 4Derio Mental Health Center (Osakidetza), Derio, Spain, 5Research Unit, Basurto University Hospital (Osakidetza), Bilbao, Spain, 6Fuenlabrada Mental Health Center, Fuenlabrada University Hospital, Madrid, Spain, 7Mental Health Unit, University Hospital of Canary Islands, Tenerife, Spain, 8Villamanta Centre, Navalcarnero Health Centre, Madrid Health Service – REDISSEC, Madrid, Spain

OBJECTIVES: The objective was to perform the validation of the Spanish EQ-5D-5L questionnaire for patients with major depression disorder, studying the psychometric properties, such as reliability and validity, including the structural validation.

METHODS: We included 433 patients with major depression, who completed the EQ-5D-5L, the BDI-II and the PHQ-9 questionnaires. The EQ-5D-5L contains five questions rated on a five-level scale, from which a utility index can be derived based on the recently developed preference-based scoring function (Ramos-Goñi et al. 2016). The BDI-II consists of 21 items conforming a global score, in addition to classifying patients according to their severity. The PHQ-9 allows to establish the diagnosis and severity of the depression. Statistical analysis: Floor and ceiling effects were examined. Reliability was assessed using Cronbach’s alpha coefficient. Structural validity was studied by confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) for categorical data. Convergent validity was studied by the Spearman correlation coefficient between EQ-5D-5L and BDI-II. We examined known-groups validity by comparing the EQ-5D-5L index among the different severity groups according to the BDI-II and PHQ-9 using the analysis of variance or Kruskal-Wallis test.

RESULTS: The floor and ceiling effects in EQ-5D-5L index were 0% and 3.94%, respectively. Cronbach’s alpha coefficient was 0.77. The fit indexes of the CFA were excellent (RMSEA=0.036, CFI=0.999, TLI=0.995) and factor loadings were all statistically significant and >0.60. The correlation between the EQ-5D-5L index and BDI-II was -0.58. Patients with higher severity level, had significantly lower scores on the EQ-5D-5L (P<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS: The results support the reliability and validity of the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire in patients with major depression disorder. Further, the hypothesis that the five items of the questionnaire make up a single factor (the utility index) is confirmed. Therefore, the recently derived EQ-5D-5L, could be very useful as an outcome measure, at least in patients with major depression disorder.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2017-11, ISPOR Europe 2017, Glasgow, Scotland

Value in Health, Vol. 20, No. 9 (October 2017)

Code

PRM155

Topic

Methodological & Statistical Research

Topic Subcategory

PRO & Related Methods

Disease

Mental Health

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×