FEASIBILITY OF PRECISION ONCOLOGY VIRTUAL TUMOR BOARDS TO OPTIMIZE DIRECT POINT-OF-CARE MANAGEMENT AND CLINICAL TRIAL ENROLLMENT OF ADVANCED CANCER PATIENTS

Author(s)

Loaiza-Bonilla A1, Kurnaz S2, Johnston K2, Culcuoglu C2, Arango B2
1Cancer Treatment Centers of America, Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2Massive Bio, Inc, New York, NY, USA

OBJECTIVES: Precision oncology encompasses the implementation of high level of evidence disease-specific and biomarker-driven diagnostic and treatment recommendations for optimized cancer care. Telemedicine and value-based care may optimize clinical trial enrollment and overall cost-benefit.

We evaluated the feasibility and clinical utility of a precision oncology virtual tumor boards (VTB) program, and its clinical impact on community-dwelling patients with advanced solid tumors to facilitate point-of-care management and clinical trial enrollment, as well as the financial impact and potential outcomes of the intervention.

METHODS: We report the results on the initial 10 VTB-evaluated patients of an ongoing prospective qualitative case study screened between October/2016 and March/2017. Eligibility required written informed consent. Cases were evaluated by a patient-activated multidisciplinary VTB.

A Markov model by incorporating clinical, utility and cost data was developed to evaluate economic outcome of VTB regarding survival and cost-of-care. Using a proprietary knowledge-base, parametric survival analyses of patient-level progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) data from reported clinical trials in known sources were performed. Average Sales Prices public data sources were used to estimate unit treatment costs and duration of subsequent active therapies. Oncology-modeled patient pathways, expert opinion and Delphi panel methods were used for assumptions.

RESULTS: The VTB identified clinical trials for 80% of these heavily treated patients, and 50% of patients decided to pursue a clinical trial. VTB resulted in data that impacted clinical decisions in 100% of cases. VTB achieved 88% cost reduction compared to standard therapies due to clinical trial enrollment (517,000USD vs 61,000USD). Treatment options as prioritized by VTB also provided an estimated reported PFS advantage (6.3 months) compared to standard therapy (3.6 months).

CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate the feasibility and benefits of incorporating precision oncology VTB into clinical practice, including its value as clinical trial recruitment engine and as a cost-effective, value-based measure for innovative care delivery models.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2017-11, ISPOR Europe 2017, Glasgow, Scotland

Value in Health, Vol. 20, No. 9 (October 2017)

Code

PCN248

Topic

Health Policy & Regulatory, Health Service Delivery & Process of Care, Patient-Centered Research, Real World Data & Information Systems, Study Approaches

Topic Subcategory

Coverage with Evidence Development & Adaptive Pathways, Health & Insurance Records Systems, Health Care Research, Health Disparities & Equity, Hospital and Clinical Practices, Patient Behavior and Incentives, Prescribing Behavior, Quality of Care Measurement, Registries, Treatment Patterns and Guidelines

Disease

Geriatrics, Oncology, Reproductive and Sexual Health

Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×