EVALUATING THE COST-UTILITY OF IMMUNOSUPPRESSIVE REGIMENS IN LIVER TRANSPLANT RECIPIENTS IN CANADA

Author(s)

Pollock RF1, Schwartz J2, Howell J3, Spalding J2
1Ossian Health Economics and Communications GmbH, Basel, Switzerland, 2Astellas Pharma Global Development, Inc., Northbrook, IL, USA, 3Astellas Pharma Global Development, Inc., Markham, ON, Canada

OBJECTIVES:

Liver transplantation is the only effective treatment option for patients with end-stage liver disease. While one-year graft survival rates are over 80% and longer-term graft and patient survival have increased dramatically since the first liver transplants, non-adherence to immunosuppression is still common and confers an increased risk of graft rejection and loss. Prolonged-release tacrolimus (PR-TAC) is a once-daily formulation of tacrolimus that may improve adherence and cause less interference with the daily activities of the patient. The present study evaluated the cost-utility of PR-TAC relative to immediate-release tacrolimus (IR-TAC) and cyclosporine in liver transplant recipients in Canada.

METHODS:

A three-state Markov model was developed to evaluate cost and utility outcomes in adult de novo liver transplant recipients using IR-TAC, PR-TAC, or cyclosporine as the primary immunosuppressive regimen. Costs were derived from Canadian sources and reported in 2016 Canadian dollars, with future costs and effects discounted at 1.5% per annum. Underlying probabilities of mortality were based on a least squares exponential model fit to data from the Canadian Organ Replacement Register, while incremental rates were determined by the results of a network meta-analysis (NMA).

RESULTS:

Over a 25-year time horizon, quality-adjusted life expectancy (QALE) increased from 12.22 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) with IR-TAC to 13.04 QALYs with PR-TAC with an accompanying increase in costs of CAD 38,899, resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of CAD 47,351 per QALY gained. Cyclosporine increased costs by CAD 4,478 and reduced QALE by 0.37 QALYs relative to IR-TAC. Sensitivity analysis showed the model to be most sensitive to mortality odds ratios and tacrolimus unit costs.

CONCLUSIONS:

Cost-utility modeling using modern data from a NMA and Canadian cost data showed that PR-TAC would likely be cost-effective relative to IR-TAC in Canada. Higher per-milligram acquisition costs need not, therefore, present a barrier to its reimbursement.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2017-11, ISPOR Europe 2017, Glasgow, Scotland

Value in Health, Vol. 20, No. 9 (October 2017)

Code

PHP94

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis

Disease

Multiple Diseases

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×