COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF PONATINIB IN THE TREATMENT OF PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC PHASE- CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA IN GREECE
Author(s)
Gourzoulidis G1, Kourlaba G1, Giannoulia P2, Panagiotidis P3, Maniadakis N4
1Evroston LP, Athens, Greece, 2Evangelismos General Hospital, Athens, Greece, 3Laiko General Hospital, Athens, Greece, 4National School of Public Health, Athens, Greece
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of ponatinib compared to bosutinib, allogeneic stem cell transplantation(allo-SCT) and hydroxycarbamide as treatment of adult patients with Chronic Phase -Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CP-CML) who failed prior therapy with dasatinib or nilotinib for reasons of resistance/intolerance to, and for whom subsequent treatment with imatinib is not clinically appropriate, or who have the T315I mutation in the Greek healthcare setting. METHODS: A markov model with three-month cycle was locally adapted from a third-party payer perspective to reflect the natural progression of patients with CP-CML through different health states over a life-time horizon (50-years). The clinical inputs as well as utility values were extracted from relevant clinical trials and published studies. Resource consumption data of CP-CML patients were obtained from local experts and the relevant unit costs from local resources(in €2017). Primary outcomes were patient quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), total costs and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) per QALY gained. Both costs and outcomes were discounted at 3.5% per annum. A probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA) was conducted to account for uncertainty in the model. RESULTS: The analysis showed that ponatinib was associated with 4.21, 4.09 and 5.99 increment in QALYs compared with bosutinib, allo-SCT, and hydroxycarbamide, respectively, at additional cost of €160,679, €74,482 and €180,014, respectively. The corresponding ICERs were €38,161, €18,226 and €30,050 per QALY gained versus bosutinib, allo-SCT, and hydroxycarbamide, respectively. At the predefined willingness to pay threshold of €51,000 per QALY gained (3 times of Greek GDP, based on WHO), PSA estimated that treatment with ponatinib had a probability of 80% to be a cost-effective option compared to bosutinib and 94% compared to allo-SCT and hydroxycarbamide. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that ponatinib provides substantial clinical benefit as compared with current treatment alternatives at a reasonable cost. Hence, ponatinib may represent a cost–effective treatment option for patients with CP-CML in Greece
Conference/Value in Health Info
2017-11, ISPOR Europe 2017, Glasgow, Scotland
Value in Health, Vol. 20, No. 9 (October 2017)
Code
PCN129
Topic
Economic Evaluation
Topic Subcategory
Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis
Disease
Oncology