COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF PONATINIB IN THE TREATMENT OF PATIENTS WITH ACCELERATED OR BLAST PHASE - CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA IN GREECE

Author(s)

Gourzoulidis G1, Kourlaba G1, Giannoulia P2, Panagiotidis P3, Maniadakis N4
1Evroston LP, Athens, Greece, 2Evangelismos General Hospital, Athens, Greece, 3Laiko General Hospital, Athens, Greece, 4National School of Public Health, Athens, Greece

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of ponatinib compared to bosutinib, allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) and hydroxycarbamide in the treatment of adult patients with accelerated or blast phase - Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (AP/ΒP-CML) whose disease is resistant/ intolerant to dasatinib or nilotinib and for whom subsequent treatment with imatinib is not clinically appropriate, or who have the T315I mutation in the Greek healthcare setting.

METHODS: A markov model was locally adapted from a third-party payer perspective over a 50-year time horizon. Efficacy, safety and utility data were extracted from relevant clinical trials and the literature. Resource consumption data were obtained from local experts and were combined with unit costs (in €2017) obtained from official sources. Primary outcomes were patient quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), total costs and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) per QALY gained. All the future outcomes were discounted at 3.5% per annum. A probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA) was conducted.

RESULTS: Total life time cost per patient in BP-CML was estimated at €29,895, €16,038, €42,893, and €8,609 for ponatinib, bosutinib, allo-SCT and hydroxycarbamide, respectively. In terms of health outcomes, ponatinib was associated with 0.96, 0.48 and 1.05 increment in QALYs compared with bosutinib, allo-SCT, and hydroxycarbamide respectively, resulting in ICERs of €14,481 and €20,288 per QALY gained versus bosutinib and hydroxycarbamide. Similar results were found in AP-CML with ICERs reaching at €679 and €13,878 per QALY gained, respectively. Moreover, ponatinib was a dominant alternative over allo-SCT in both AP/BP-CML. PSA revealed that the probability of ponatinib being a cost-effective option at the predetermined threshold of €51,000 per QALY gained was higher than 95% versus all available comparators in both AP/BP- CML.

CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that, ponatinib seems to be a cost–effective option compared to other alternative therapies in the treatment of AP/BP-CML patients in Greece.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2017-11, ISPOR Europe 2017, Glasgow, Scotland

Value in Health, Vol. 20, No. 9 (October 2017)

Code

PCN136

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis

Disease

Oncology

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×