COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF PET/CT IN PRE-OPERATIVE STAGING OF PANCREATIC CANCER- AN ECONOMIC EVALUATION OF THE PET-PANC COHORT STUDY
Author(s)
Plumpton CO1, Ghaneh P2, Lloyd-Williams H1, Yeo ST1, Edwards RT1
1Bangor University, Bangor, UK, 2University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
OBJECTIVES: Diagnosis of pancreatic cancer is challenging as patients may be relatively asymptomatic during its early course. PET/CT may improve diagnosis and staging of pancreatic cancer but is not widely used across the UK. There is uncertainty whether PET/CT represents good value for money. This study aimed to model the cost-effectiveness of PET/CT compared with multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) alone in the diagnosis and management of patients with pancreatic cancer, based on data collected from the multi-centre PET-PANC cohort study. METHODS: A decision-analytic model was developed to compare patient pathways following diagnosis with PET/CT compared with MDCT alone. Patient management strategies following PET/CT were taken from PET-PANC. Patient management strategies following MDCT alone were based on clinical interpretation of the initial MDCT diagnosis. Event-based regressions were used associate strategies with cost and QALY data collected during PET-PANC. Analysis was conducted from the perspective of the UK National Health Service (NHS), over a 12-month time-horizon. Uncertainty was considered in univariate and multivariate sensitivity analyses. Subgroup analysis considered the impact of PET/CT on patients with diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis; malignancy; and those who were scheduled for resection surgery. RESULTS: The mean total cost and QALYs of pancreatic cancer service use over 12-months were £13,193 per patient (95% confidence interval (CI): £11,634, £14,802), and 0.5540 (95% CI: 0.5261, 0.5811), respectively. PET/CT dominated MDCT, being both less costly and more effective. The largest cost saving and highest QALY gain were seen for the subgroup scheduled for resection surgery. The probability of cost-effectiveness at a threshold of £20,000/QALY was 82%. CONCLUSIONS: It is likely that use of PET/CT in the diagnosis and staging of pancreatic cancer is cost-effective for the UK NHS, with the most cost-effective use of PET/CT being in patients who are suspected of having pancreatic cancer and are scheduled for resection surgery following MDCT.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2017-11, ISPOR Europe 2017, Glasgow, Scotland
Value in Health, Vol. 20, No. 9 (October 2017)
Code
PMD94
Topic
Economic Evaluation
Topic Subcategory
Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis
Disease
Oncology