COST EFFECTIVENESS OF OPTIFAST® LCD AS COMPARED WITH LIRAGLUTIDE 3 MG AND “NO INTERVENTION” IN SWITZERLAND
Author(s)
Nuijten M1, Marczewska AM2, Araujo Torres K2, Morton M2, Perugini M2
1A2M - Minerva, Jisp, The Netherlands, 2Nestlé Health Science, Vevey, Switzerland
OBJECTIVES: Obesity is associated with high direct and indirect costs related to increased healthcare utilization and loss of productivity. Optifast® is a clinically-proven total diet replacement Low Calorie Diet for obesity management. In the context of a medically supervised weight management program, Optifast achieves a significant and durable weight loss at a rate of ≈ 1 kg per week. This health economic model aims to demonstrate potential cost savings of Optifast®program in Switzerland, as compared to “no intervention” and pharmacotherapy with liraglutide 3 mg. Payers’ and employers’ perspectives are taken into account. METHODS: An event-driven decision analytic model estimated the cost-effectiveness of 1-year Optifast® program over 10 years period in Switzerland. The analysis was performed for the broad population of obese persons (BMI > 30 kg/m) treated with Optifast® vs liraglutide 3 mg and vs “no intervention”. The model includes the risk of complications related to increased BMI; data sources include published literature, clinical trials, official Swiss price/tariff lists and national population statistics. The primary perspective is that of the Swiss payer and employer; costs are in 2016 CHF. RESULTS: Optifast® leads to cost savings for payers (CHF 5,623) and employers (CHF 30,307) over 10 years versus “no intervention” by reducing the cost of obesity complications. Compared to liraglutide 3 mg, Optifast® leads to additional cost savings for payers (CHF 9,732) and employers (CHF 14,187) over the same time period. Scenario analyses show additional cost savings in patients with severe obesity (BMI>40 kg/m), with T2 diabetes mellitus. CONCLUSIONS: Reimbursing Optifast® leads to meaningful costs savings for Swiss payers and employers as compared with liraglutide 3 mg and with “no intervention” in obese patients. Similar results could be expected in matching healthcare settings of other countries.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2017-11, ISPOR Europe 2017, Glasgow, Scotland
Value in Health, Vol. 20, No. 9 (October 2017)
Code
PSY59
Topic
Economic Evaluation
Topic Subcategory
Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis
Disease
Diabetes/Endocrine/Metabolic Disorders