COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS OF APREMILAST FOR THE TREATMENT OF ACTIVE PSORIATIC ARTHRITIS IN GREECE

Author(s)

Solakidi A1, Tzanetakos C1, Maniadakis N2
1EVROSTON LP, Athens, Greece, 2National School of Public Health, Athens, Greece

OBJECTIVES: To assess the cost-effectiveness of placing apremilast before biologics in adult patients with active psoriatic arthritis, who have failed to respond to or are intolerant of conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs from a Greek payer perspective.

METHODS: A 40-year Markov transition model with monthly cycle duration was used. Treatment strategies consisted of apremilast prior to a biologic drug sequence compared with a biologic-only sequence. Sequential biologics were etanercept, adalimumab, golimumab and infliximab for both treatment strategies. Patients failing infliximab received best supportive care as last line of treatment. Response to treatment was assessed using the Psoriatic Arthritis Response Criteria (PsARC) at the end of the trial periods, obtained from a meta-analysis. Non-responders moved to the next treatment line. Long-term treatment withdrawal and patients’ adjusted mortality rates were retrieved from the literature and national published sources. Utilities were obtained as a linear function of the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) and Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) scores based on a published regression equation. Following a payer perspective, direct costs relating to drug acquisition, administration, monitoring and overall patient management were considered (€, 2017). An annual discount rate of 3.5% was applied for costs and health benefits.

RESULTS: The apremilast sequence before biologics resulted in an incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained of €23,242. Specifically, apremilast sequence was associated with 0.35 incremental QALYs compared with the biologic-only sequence (9.62 vs 9.27), at additional costs of €8,218 (€142,887 vs €134,670) over a patient’s lifetime. Results were most sensitive to changes in HAQ score and discount rates. At the defined willingness-to-pay threshold of €34,000, apremilast sequence was estimated to have a 79% probability of being cost-effective.

CONCLUSIONS: Placing apremilast before biologics was found to be a cost-effective strategy for the treatment of active PsA in the Greek healthcare setting.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2017-11, ISPOR Europe 2017, Glasgow, Scotland

Value in Health, Vol. 20, No. 9 (October 2017)

Code

PMS45

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis

Disease

Musculoskeletal Disorders, Sensory System Disorders

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×