ASSESSING THE HEALTHCARE COST OF DIABETIC NON-SMALL CELL LUNG CANCER PATIENTS COMPARED TO NON-SMALL CELL LUNG CANCER PATIENTS

Author(s)

Ruban C1, Blanchette CM2, Howden R3, Kowalkowski M4, Marino J1, Saunders W5
1University of North Carolina Charlotte, Charlotte, NC, USA, 2Precision Health Economics, Davidson, NC, USA, 3University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, NC, USA, 4Levine Cancer Institute, Charlotte, NC, USA, 5UNC Charlotte College of Health and Human Services – Health Informatics, Charlotte, NC, USA

OBJECTIVES: Cancer is the second leading cause of death worldwide. Mechanisms involved in the relationship between type 2 Diabetes (T2D) and cancer is not completely understood, and even less is known about its association with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC). While these systemic responses are reasonably well understood, an adequate explanation how health care utilization is impacted for patients with both T2D and NSCLC is lacking. Our objective was to investigate the cost of care for T2D patients with NSCLC.

METHODS:

We conducted a cohort study design utilizing Medicare claims from the SEER-Medicare linked database (2007 - 2014). Quantile regression was used to estimate the predicted mean at the 25th, 50th and 75th percentile for total healthcare costs after incident NSCLC diagnosis. The quantile regression was adjusted for cancer stage, geographical region, gender, age, race and comorbidities. Total healthcare costs were then divided by the number of days within the 25th, 50th and 75th quantiles to adjust for varying follow up. Cost data represented the actual paid (reimbursed by Medicare) amounts for health services. x

RESULTS:

Of 17,176 NSCLC patients, 5,096 patients had T2D in the pre-period. For NSCLC patients, the predicted mean value at the 25th quantile was $2.36/day, at the 50thquantile $5.69/day and at the 75thquantile /$7.23/day. For, diabetic NSCLC patients, the predicted mean value at the 25thquantile was $4.13/day, at the 50thquantile $9.16/day and at the 75th \quantile $48.64/day.

CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the challenges in analyzing cost data due to variations in factors impacting healthcare costs. Care should be taken when developing interventions directing resources at those most likely to benefit as traditional regression analysis may be less useful than methods such as quantile regression, which provide robust insights into healthcare cost of specific patient sub-groups.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2017-11, ISPOR Europe 2017, Glasgow, Scotland

Value in Health, Vol. 20, No. 9 (October 2017)

Code

PCN90

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Cost/Cost of Illness/Resource Use Studies

Disease

Diabetes/Endocrine/Metabolic Disorders, Oncology

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×