A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE HEALTH CARE UTILIZATION AND COSTS OF PATIENTS DIAGNOSED WITH AND WITHOUT LIVER CANCER IN THE US MEDICARE POPULATION

Author(s)

Ogbomo A1, Lin Y1, Keshishian A1, Xie L1, Yuce H2, Baser O3
1STATinMED Research, Ann Arbor, MI, USA, 2New York City College of Technology-CUNY and STATinMED Research, New York, NY, USA, 3Columbia University/MEF University/STATinMED Research, New York, NY, USA

OBJECTIVES: To compare the health care utilization (HRU) and costs of patients with and without liver cancer in the US Medicare population.

METHODS: A retrospective data analysis was performed using 5% national Medicare data from 01JAN2011-31DEC2015. Adult patients diagnosed with liver cancer were identified using International Classification of Diseases, 9th and 10th Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM; ICD-10-CM) diagnosis codes (ICD-9-CM code 155; ICD-10-CM code C22). The diagnosis date was designated as the index date. A comparison cohort of patients without a liver cancer diagnosis was created for patients of the same age, gender, race, baseline individual comorbidities, and Charlson comorbidity index score. A random index date was chosen for the comparison cohort to reduce selection bias. Patients in both cohorts were required to have continuous medical and pharmacy benefits 12 months pre- and post-index date. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to compare follow-up HRU and costs between the cohorts, adjusting for demographic and clinical characteristics.

RESULTS: After applying PSM, a total of 270 patients were included in each cohort (liver cancer and comparator cohorts), and baseline characteristics were balanced. A higher proportion of patients diagnosed with liver cancer had higher inpatient (40.00% vs 8.15%; p<0.0001) emergency room (ER; 32.6% vs 12.59%; p<0.0001), office (96.3% vs 77.41%; p<0.0001), outpatient (85.93% vs 53.33%, p<0.0001), and skilled nursing facility (SNF) (7.41% vs 1.11%; p=0.0003) utilization compared to patients in the comparator cohort. The liver cancer cohort also incurred significantly higher inpatient ($14,298 vs $2,279; p<0.0001), ER ($320 vs $104; p<0.0001), office ($8,585 vs $1,523; P<0.0001), outpatient ($21,039 vs $3,158; p<0.0001), SNF ($1,381 vs $193; p<0.0001), Part D pharmacy ($4,794 vs $9,549; p<0.0001), and total ($53,828 vs $9,549; p<0.0001) costs.

CONCLUSIONS: Liver cancer patients incurred higher HRU and costs than those without liver cancer.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2017-11, ISPOR Europe 2017, Glasgow, Scotland

Value in Health, Vol. 20, No. 9 (October 2017)

Code

PCN296

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Cost/Cost of Illness/Resource Use Studies

Disease

Oncology

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×