LOCALLY ADVANCED OR METASTATIC UROTHELIAL CARCINOMA IN THE UNITED STATES- ECONOMIC BURDEN AND HEALTHCARE UTILIZATION

Author(s)

Kearney M1, Esposito D2, Russo L3, Penalvo J4, Yin R2, Lyons J2, Lanes S2, Bharmal M1
1Global Evidence & Value Development, Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany, 2Safety and Epidemiology, HealthCore, Inc., Andover, MA, USA, 3Pfizer, Inc, Collegeville, PA, USA, 4Global Epidemiology, Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany

OBJECTIVES : To describe patient characteristics, comorbidities, treatments patterns, healthcare resource utilization (HRU) and costs in locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma patients.

METHODS : Eligible patients were identified in the HealthCore Integrated Research Environment (HIRE) if they had ≥1 ICD-9-CM or ICD-10 diagnosis code for urothelial carcinoma and were continuously enrolled for ≥6 months during the study period (2010 - 2016). Locally advanced or metastatic disease (mUC) staging was confirmed by patient record linkage with 3 US state cancer registries and HIRE-Oncology dataset. The index date was the date of first urothelial carcinoma diagnosis for newly diagnosed patients and the 180th day of continuous enrollment for all others. All HRU and costs were calculated on a per-patient per-year basis (PPPY) and adjusted to 2016 US dollars. Patient characteristics were described at index date, and treatments, HRU and costs were described during follow-up.

RESULTS : A total of 791 patients with confirmed mUC were identified, 430 (54.4%) of which were newly diagnosed. Mean age ±SD was 69.3 ±11.6 years (median = 70) and 69.9% were men. The mean Deyo-Charlson Comorbidity Index was 3.3 ±3.7 (median = 2). Median follow-up was 15 months. Most patients had ≥1 surgical procedure (61.8 %), and/or received anti-cancer therapy (60.9%); use of radiation therapy was less frequent (19.6%). Patients with mUC had substantial HRU with medians of 72.5 outpatient visits (interquartile range [IQR]: 41.8-110.0) and 1.6 hospitalizations (IQR: 0.5-3.8) PPPY. Median all-cause medical costs amounted to $76,952 (IQR: $34,069; $148,787) PPPY, mainly driven by inpatient costs (36.9%).

CONCLUSIONS : This analysis describes the clinical management and costs of mUC patients within a managed care environment. It demonstrates that mUC is associated with substantial healthcare resource use and costs, driven primarily by hospitalizations in a mostly elderly and highly comorbid patient population.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2018-05, ISPOR 2018, Baltimore, MD, USA

Value in Health, Vol. 21, S1 (May 2018)

Code

PCN214

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Cost/Cost of Illness/Resource Use Studies

Disease

Oncology, Urinary/Kidney Disorders

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×