INPATIENT COST OF ACUTE CARE FOR SEVERE BURN PATIENTS- VALIDATION OF ECONOMIC MODEL FOR ADULTS AND CHILDREN

Author(s)

Bilir SP1, Kruger E1, Kowal S2, Holmes IV H3, Hickerson W4, Foster K5, Nystrom SV6, Turley DM6, Sparks J7, Iyer N6, Quick A7
1IQVIA, San Francisco, CA, USA, 2IQVIA, Fairfax, VA, USA, 3Wake Forest University Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC, USA, 4University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA, 5Arizona Burn Center, Phoenix, AZ, USA, 6US Dept. of Health and Human Services (HHS), Washington, DC, USA, 7Avita Medical, Valencia, CA, USA

OBJECTIVES: Treating burns from intentional threats or accidents is costly, due to the need for complex and individualized care. Currently, no validated economic model is available to assess the costs and clinical impact of new interventions versus standard of care (SOC) for inpatient treatment of acute burns. To address this limitation, an economic model was developed to permit cost-effectiveness analyses and provide budget impact modeling of new interventions to manage burns (total body surface area [TBSA] 10%+) along the care continuum in the US. Accuracy of predictions was validated against average costs from the American Burn Association National Burn Registry (NBR) database.

METHODS: A Microsoft Excel hospital-perspective model was developed using sequential decision trees to estimate resource use and costs for five care phases (wound assessment, debridement/excision, temporary coverage, permanent closure, and rehabilitation). Regression equations utilized NBR data to inform number of procedures (autograft, debridement, excision), and length of stay (LOS). All other clinical inputs were derived from published studies and burn surgeon interviews. Hospital resource use and unit costs were obtained from surveying three hospital administrators.

RESULTS: Model equations accurately predicted number of procedures and LOS. Controlling for patient characteristics and comorbidities, total predicted costs were $111,217, $177,830 and $301,516 for adults (18+) with TBSA <15%, 15-25 and 25-40% respectively, within 2.8-8% of NBR costs. For pediatrics, predicted costs were less accurate: $73,678, $140,120 and $267,553 per TBSA category versus $59,937, 104,137 and $228,764 in the NBR (difference of 17-35%).

CONCLUSIONS: This is the first economic model examining the continuum of definitive care in burns. This allows for a comprehensive comparison of value of new burn treatments versus SOC. The model accurately predicts costs for adults; however, results showed less accurate predictions for pediatrics. Future work to better inform pediatric hospital cost data will improve accuracy, aiding in decision-making.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2018-05, ISPOR 2018, Baltimore, MD, USA

Value in Health, Vol. 21, S1 (May 2018)

Code

PRM29

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Cost/Cost of Illness/Resource Use Studies

Disease

Multiple Diseases

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×