HOSPITALISATION RATE AS A PROXY OUTCOME FOR CLINICAL VALUE IN A PROTOCOLISED CANCER TREATMENT ENVIRONMENT

Author(s)

Izzett M1, Kotze L1, Marais E2, Snyman J2
1Isimo Health, Bellville, South Africa, 2MSH, Bellville, South Africa

OBJECTIVES

:
A previous study by the Independent Clinical Oncology Network (ICON), in South Africa, demonstrated that treatment plans submitted using ICON’s evidence-based protocols result in cost savings. Protocolised treatments are often criticised for possible cost shifting and or compromising clinical care. The aim of this study was to measure oncologist managed hospitalisation events, as a proxy outcome for: clinical need, an indicator of patient well-being, and potential cost shifting because of protocolised treatment. Access to hospitalisation was unrestricted and similar (not protocolised) across the cohort to be studied.

METHODS

:
A retrospective analysis was conducted of claims data, acquired from third party funders that contract the ICON Network, for the year 2016. The data (n₁=9444) was governed by a requirement to adhere to treatment protocols. The control group (n₂=2008) was under no protocol restriction and seen by a different group of oncologists. The hospital admission rate and total stay duration were measured per patient where the treating doctor for the hospital event was an oncologist. Case mix was adjusted by diagnosis (using admission ICD10 code). The smaller cohort dataset (n) was extrapolated proportionally by diagnosis (random sampling with replacement). The same methodology was applied to 2015 data to validate the methodology.

RESULTS

:
The hospitalisation rate for patients under protocolised treatment, 16.07%, was significantly less (99% CI, p<0.0022, Chi-squared test) than the control group, 17.64%. The average hospital stay duration, 1.62 days, for patients under protocolised treatment was also significantly less (99% CI, p<0.0022, student’s t test) than the control group, 1.95 days. The results were validated against data from 2015 (n₁=8559, n₂=1870): that showed significantly lower hospitalisation rate and hospital stay duration in comparison to the control group.

CONCLUSIONS

:
Using hospitalisation metrics as a proxy outcome of patient well-being and cost shifting, the ICON solution demonstrates significant value without compromising care.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2018-05, ISPOR 2018, Baltimore, MD, USA

Value in Health, Vol. 21, S1 (May 2018)

Code

PHS7

Topic

Clinical Outcomes, Epidemiology & Public Health

Topic Subcategory

Comparative Effectiveness or Efficacy

Disease

Oncology

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×