COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF TOFACITINIB IN PATIENTS WITH RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS IN CHINA
Author(s)
Wang BC1, Chen Y2, Furnback W1, Wu Q2, Dong P2
1Elysia Group Ltd, Taipei, Taiwan, 2Pfizer Investment Co., Ltd., Beijing, China
OBJECTIVES : Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is an autoimmune disease that causes inflammation and leads to bone destruction and other extra-articular and systemic manifestations. This analysis examined the cost-effectiveness of tofacitinib in patients with RA in China. METHODS : A previously published lifetime, cohort-based, cost-effectiveness model for patients with rheumatoid arthritis was localized to China. The model evaluated three possible lines of biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) therapy plus a final line of palliative care in patients with an inadequate response to non-biologic DMARDs (cDMARD-IR). Included therapeutic options were the following: tofacitinib, YSP (etanercept biosimilar), adalimumab, infliximab, toclizumab, and palliative care (methotrexate and leflunomide). YSP was assumed to have equal effectiveness to etanercept in the base case, and 90% in sensitivity analysis. Response to therapy was evaluated every 6 months through American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria (first-line biologic) and Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) scores (subsequent lines). HAQ-DI scores were mapped to utility values to calculate QALYs. Drug costs, adverse events (injection-site reactions and severe infections), physician costs, and administration costs were included. Costs were presented in 2017 CNY and from a payer’s perspective. RESULTS : The sequence of tofacitinib, adalimumab, and infliximab dominated (less costly, more effective than) YSP followed by adalimumab, and then toclizumab (incremental costs and QALYs of -¥39,257 and 0.44). Tofacitinib was cost-effective against YSP when both treatments were followed by infliximab (second-line) and toclizumab (third-line) with an ICER of ¥380 (incremental cost and QALYs of ¥172 and 0.45, respectively). Tofacitinib was, again, cost-effective against YSP when both were followed by adalimumab (second-line) and toclizumab (third-line) with an ICER of ¥86,688 (incremental costs and QALYs of ¥58,589 and 0.68, respectively). Sensitivity analysis related to YSP’s effectiveness confirmed the base case results. CONCLUSIONS : Tofacitinib is a cost-effective alternative to YSP in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in China.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2018-05, ISPOR 2018, Baltimore, MD, USA
Value in Health, Vol. 21, S1 (May 2018)
Code
PMS40
Topic
Economic Evaluation
Topic Subcategory
Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis
Disease
Musculoskeletal Disorders