COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF THERAPEUTIC DRUG MONITORING FOR IMATINIB ADMINISTRATION IN PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA

Author(s)

Kim K, Walker B, McMillin GA, Bernard PS, Schmidt RL
University of Utah, Salt Lake city, UT, USA

OBJECTIVES : Generic imatinib mesylate (IM) is an effective therapy and is the least costly option for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) has the potential to improve the adherence to IM therapy allowing patients to stay in remission and avoid switching to more toxic and expensive tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI). The objective of this study was to determine the cost effectiveness of TDM for generic IM administration in CML patients.

METHODS : We built a Markov model depicting multiple CML states including normal IM dose (400mg), IM dose escalation (600mg), secondary TKI and post TKI phases to calculate an incremental cost effectiveness ratio (ICER) for TDM in reference to non-TDM monitoring . We assumed all patients were followed by molecular monitoring. Transition from normal IM dose to either dose escalation or secondary TKI was determined by the patient response and known plasma concentration (Cp) of IM. The response and Cp were a function of adherence. CML related healthcare costs and quality adjusted life years (QALY) were calculated over a lifetime. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses conditional on multiple levels of generic IM price were performed.

RESULTS : TDM was associated with higher cost ($3,344) and an increase in QALY (0.085) compared to non-TDM with an ICER of $39,126 per QALY gained. The ICER was sensitive to the dose-Cp association and the price of IM. TDM achieved a 60% likelihood of being cost-effective at willingness to pay (WTP) threshold $100,000 per QALY gained at the current price. The acceptability at $100,000/QALY increased to 66% when the price of generic IM was reduced by 50%.

CONCLUSIONS : TDM is likely cost-effective compared to non-TDM. However, the likelihood of acceptance of TDM was less than 70% at the conventional level of the WTP, $100,000 per QALY gained.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2018-05, ISPOR 2018, Baltimore, MD, USA

Value in Health, Vol. 21, S1 (May 2018)

Code

PHS40

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis

Disease

Systemic Disorders/Conditions

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×