COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF SACUBITRIL/VALSARTAN IN THE TREATMENT OF HEART FAILURE IN COSTA RICA
Author(s)
Lacey MJ1, Brouillette M1, Lenhart G1, Hernández Matamoros H2, Quesada Chaves DF3, Bonilla Sinibaldi F4, Russell MW1
1IBM Watson Health, Cambridge, MA, USA, 2Hospital San Rafael de Alajuela, Alajuela, Costa Rica, 3Hospital San Vicente de Paul, Heredia, Costa Rica, 4Novartis Pharma Logistics, Guatemala City, Guatemala
OBJECTIVES : To analyze the cost-effectiveness of sacubitril/valsartan versus usual care in heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class II-IV, in Costa Rica. METHODS : Previously developed UK cost-effectiveness model based on PARADIGM-HF (McMurray, 2014) trial was adapted to Costa Rica using Latin-American trial subgroup (N=1,433) and Costa Rica-specific epidemiologic and economic data to assess the impact of sacubitril/valsartan versus usual care (ACEi). A regression-based (Markov) cost-utility model with one month cycling was utilized to examine a hypothetical cohort of HFrEF patients. Clinical outcomes included mortality, hospitalization, and adverse events. Quality-adjusted-life years (QALY) were derived from PARADIGM-HF. Costs (2017- colones - ₡) include drug, hospitalization and resources. Primary outcome was cost-utility (cost/QALY gained) over a 30-year time horizon. Sensitivity analyses were performed. RESULTS : Base-case results suggest that compared to ACEi, sacubitril/valsartan is associated with incremental costs of ₡3,385,614 and 0.53 QALYs gained, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of ₡6,400,593 per QALY gained. Increased costs of pharmacological therapy were offset by reductions in hospitalization costs. All-cause– and CV-related mortality estimates were reduced at all time points. Expected survival estimates increased from 5.84 years for those receiving an ACEi to 6.45 years for those receiving sacubitril/valsartan. Overall, results were not sensitive to changes in model parameters; results were most sensitive to CV mortality estimates and treatment-effect duration. CONCLUSIONS : The Costa Rica-adapted model estimates suggest that sacubitril/valsartan represents a cost-effective intervention in the treatment of HFrEF (NYHA Class II-IV) versus ACEi, assuming a willingness-to-pay threshold of 3 times per capita GDP in Costa Rica (₡25,807,290). Consequently, sacubitril/valsartan represents reasonable value compared with other commonly accepted health care interventions.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2018-05, ISPOR 2018, Baltimore, MD, USA
Value in Health, Vol. 21, S1 (May 2018)
Code
PCV43
Topic
Economic Evaluation
Topic Subcategory
Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis
Disease
Cardiovascular Disorders