COMPARISON OF METHODS TO ESTIMATE DISEASE-RELATED COST IN THE TRUVEN MARKETSCAN ADMINSTRATIVE CLAIMS DATABASE
Author(s)
Schroeder KM1, Gelwicks SC1, Schoenfeld MJ1, Naegeli A1, Heaton PC2
1Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA, 2University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA
OBJECTIVES: Compare four methods of calculating disease-related cost. METHODS: This study utilized the Truven Marketscan® claims database and two disease cohorts, Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) and Ulcerative Colitis (UC). Patients were age 18+, had two diagnoses for either RA or UC, no other autoimmune conditions and were continuously enrolled in 2015. Disease cohorts were matched to controls using age, gender, region and insurance type. In cost methods 1, 3, and 4, disease-related inpatient costs were attributed using the primary diagnosis field. In addition, method 1 included outpatient cost if the disease was on the claim and pharmacy cost using a pre-determined drug list. Method 2 included outpatient/pharmacy cost for procedures/medications occurring at increased frequency in the disease cohorts versus controls (1.5x and 3.5x were both tested). Method 3 used the difference in total cost between disease cohorts and matched controls. Method 4 (RA only) served as our internal standard method and utilized a separate stand-alone clinician review of codes received by the RA cohort. Outpatient/pharmacy claims flagged as RA-related were included in the Method 4 analysis. RESULTS:
Conference/Value in Health Info
2018-05, ISPOR 2018, Baltimore, MD, USA
Value in Health, Vol. 21, S1 (May 2018)
Code
PRM28
Topic
Economic Evaluation
Topic Subcategory
Cost/Cost of Illness/Resource Use Studies
Disease
Multiple Diseases
Your browser is out-of-date
ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now