COMPARATIVE EFFICACY OF CONSOLIDATION THERAPY AFTER CHEMORADIATION THERAPY (CRT) IN PATIENTS WITH UNRESECTABLE, LOCALLY ADVANCED NON-SMALL CELL LUNG CANCER (LA-NSCLC)- A NETWORK META-ANALYSIS

Author(s)

Husain F1, Harari O2, Fazeli MS1, Zhang Y3
1Doctor Evidence, Santa Monica, CA, USA, 2MTEK Sciences, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 3AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, MD, USA

OBJECTIVES: For patients with unresectable LA-NSCLC who successfully complete definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy (cCRT), durvalumab is the only consolidation treatment recommended by national clinical practice guidelines. Other non-approved agents are also used, but data on comparative clinical efficacy are limited. This study evaluated the comparative clinical efficacy of consolidation therapies after cCRT.

METHODS: MEDLINE, CENTRAL and Embase databases were systematically searched to identify phase III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) including cCRT with/without consolidation treatment for LA-NSCLC. Trials with progression-free survival (PFS) data were incorporated into a fixed-effects, proportional hazards Bayesian network meta-analysis. Only PFS outcomes were examined.

RESULTS: Of 4,752 records screened, 9 phase III trials met the eligibility criteria for this review, of which only 4 provided sufficient data after cCRT completion for direct incorporation into the meta-analysis (category-1). The remaining 5 trials did not report outcome measures after cCRT completion (category-2), limiting comparisons with other studies. Among category-1 studies, durvalumab demonstrated superior efficacy for PFS relative to each comparator including no consolidation therapy (hazard ratio [HR] 0.49 [95% credible interval (CrI): 0.41-0.56]; HR 0.52 [95% CI 0.42-0.65] from original PACIFIC trial), docetaxel (HR 0.42 [95% CrI: 0.28-0.63]), paclitaxel (HR 0.28 [95% CrI: 0.18-0.43]) and vinorelbine + cisplatin (HR 0.48 [95% CrI: 0.34-0.70]) administered in a consolidation setting. Further, paclitaxel demonstrated poorer PFS relative to no consolidation therapy (HR 1.74 [95% CrI: 1.15-2.62]). Important limitations included moderate between-trial heterogeneity, and small numbers of RCTs with varying quality and sample sizes.

CONCLUSIONS: In this network meta-analysis, durvalumab demonstrated superior efficacy for PFS relative to comparable consolidation therapies, or no consolidation therapy, for patients with unresectable LA-NSCLC, while paclitaxel demonstrated evidence of shortening PFS in this treatment setting. Additional analyses are warranted to incorporate category-2 RCTs using more sophisticated hazard functions and to assess overall survival, safety and other relevant outcome data.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2018-05, ISPOR 2018, Baltimore, MD, USA

Value in Health, Vol. 21, S1 (May 2018)

Code

PCN11

Topic

Clinical Outcomes

Topic Subcategory

Comparative Effectiveness or Efficacy

Disease

Oncology

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×