BUDGET IMPACT OF ADDING A NEW SINGLE INHALER TRIPLE THERAPY (SITT) FOR THE TREATMENT OF PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC OBSTRUCTIVE PULMONARY DISEASE (COPD) IN THE UK
Author(s)
Shah D1, Schroeder M2, Martin AA3, Risebrough N4, Ndirangu K5, Ismaila A6
1ICON Health Economics, New York City, NY, USA, 2GSK, Brentford, UK, 3GSK, Uxbridge, UK, 4ICON Health Economics, ICON, Toronto, ON, Canada, 5ICON Health Economics, ICON plc, New York, NY, USA, 6GSK, Collegeville, PA, USA
OBJECTIVES : A budget impact model was developed to assess the financial impact of introducing single inhaler, once-daily fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol (FF/UMEC/VI) 100μg/62.5μg/25μg to the UK National Health Service formulary for treatment of patients with moderate to severe COPD. METHODS : Relevant inhaled corticosteroids (ICS)/ long-acting beta agonist (LABA) and LABA/ long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) fixed-dose combinations as well as ICS/LABA + LAMA multiple inhaler triple therapies (MITTs), approved for the treatment of COPD in the UK, were considered in the analysis. An epidemiological approach leveraging local prescribing data was used with a three-year time horizon. Only drug acquisition costs (in 2017 GBP) were considered. Model outputs included the number of COPD patients treated and incremental budget impact following the introduction of FF/UMEC/VI. In the base-case, it was assumed that market share of FF/UMEC/VI would be 2%, 7% and 10% in years 1-3, respectively, 100% of which was taken from ICS/LABA + LAMA MITTs and 100% patient compliance. Sensitivity analyses were performed on input parameters. RESULTS : Based on a conservative prevalence estimate, the number of COPD patients in the UK was 632,443, 636,573 and 640,711 in years one, two and three, respectively; with an estimated 12,649, 44,560 and 64,071 patients treated with FF/UMEC/VI. Introduction of FF/UMEC/VI to the formulary, with all market displacement coming from MITTs, would result in a cost-savings of £1,865,476, £6,571,810 and £9,449,323 in years one, two and three, respectively; resulting in the cumulative cost savings of £17,886,609. Results of one-way sensitivity analyses showed that the budget impact was most sensitive to cost (±10%) and uptake rates of FF/UMEC/VI (50% to 200%), with cost-savings over three-years ranging from £8,943,305 to £35,773,218. CONCLUSIONS : FF/UMEC/VI has potential to reduce costs for treatment of COPD patients in the UK, if FF/UMEC/VI were to displace market share from ICS/LABA + LAMA MITTs. Funding: GSK (HO1613835)
Conference/Value in Health Info
2018-05, ISPOR 2018, Baltimore, MD, USA
Value in Health, Vol. 21, S1 (May 2018)
Code
PRS15
Topic
Economic Evaluation
Topic Subcategory
Budget Impact Analysis
Disease
Respiratory-Related Disorders