BENEFITS OF A HEART-SHAPED SUTURING TECHNIQUE IN CESAROTOMY CLOSURE- EXPERIENCE FROM AN ACADEMIC MEDICAL CENTER IN CHINA
Author(s)
Wang Y1, Shang M1, Zhou Y1, Li J1, Wu Z1, Li X1, Ran J1, Yang F2, Feng W3, Xuan J4
1The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, Xiamen, China, 2Shanghai Centennial Scientific Ltd, Shanghai, China, 3Institute of Pharmaceutical Economics, Sun Yat - sen University, guangzhou, China, 4Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
OBJECTIVES : Approximately 22.9 million Cesarean Sections (C-Sections) were performed globally in 2012, accounting for 18.6% of all births. The rate in China is even higher at 40.5%. Surgical Site Infections (SSIs) and wound dehiscence are two of the most common complications, and may cause undue burden for patients. A novel closure technique was introduced at our institution in August 2015 to address these unmet needs. Thus, the objective is to compare the clinical and economic outcomes of the Heart-Shaped Suturing Technique (HSST) with Conventional Suturing Technique (CST) for cesarotomy closure. METHODS : A retrospective cohort analysis was conducted using the electronic medical records of the Obstetrics and Gynecology Department at the First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University in China. Study patients were divided into a Conventional Suturing Technique (CST) group (n=2,540; delivery between 1/2014-8/2015), and a Heart-Shaped Suturing Technique (HSST) group (n=2,598; delivery between 9/2015-3/2017). The primary endpoint was the frequency of post-operative wound complications. Exploratory outcomes included the duration and cost of hospitalization. RESULTS : There were no statistically significant differences in baseline characteristics (i.e., demographics, gestational age, number of pregnancies, number of prior C-sections, etc.) between the two groups. Using CST, a total of 12 patients experienced SSIs and/or required secondary closure vs. 2 patients when using HSST, corresponding to a wound complication rate of 0.47% and 0.077%, respectively (p<0.01). The average Length of Stay (LOS) was longer for CST (3.8 days) vs. HSST (3.5 days), although this did not reach significance. Compared with uncomplicated cases, patients with poor incisional healing had prolonged hospital stays (additional 14.8 days) and bigger hospital bills (extra 11,681 RMB). CONCLUSIONS : The wound complication rate following C-section was significantly lower using HSST when compared to the conventional approach at our institution. Wound complications also caused longer LOS and were associated with an increase in hospitalization costs.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2018-05, ISPOR 2018, Baltimore, MD, USA
Value in Health, Vol. 21, S1 (May 2018)
Code
PMD15
Topic
Clinical Outcomes
Topic Subcategory
Comparative Effectiveness or Efficacy
Disease
Reproductive and Sexual Health