A RETROSPECTIVE CLAIMS ANALYSIS OF BRONCHODILATOR MONOTHERAPY VERSUS DUAL BRONCHODILATOR FIXED-DOSE COMBINATION IN PATIENTS WITH COPD
Author(s)
Strange C1, Walker V2, Tong J2, Kurlander J2, Carlyle M2, Millette L3, Wittbrodt E3
1Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA, 2Optum, Eden Prairie, MN, USA, 3AstraZeneca, Wilmington, DE, USA
OBJECTIVES: Patients with COPD increasingly receive combination bronchodilator therapies. Real-world evidence for the benefits of combination therapy compared to monotherapy is lacking. METHODS: COPD patients aged ≥40 years initiating monotherapy (MT) with either a LAMA or LABA, or LAMA/LABA FDC dual therapy (DT) between January 1, 2016 and December 31, 2016 were identified from a large US administrative claims database. Patients who were diagnosed with cystic fibrosis, idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, or asthma were excluded. Cohorts were propensity score matched (PSM) 1:1 using baseline claims measures (e.g., exacerbations, hospitalizations) as proxies for COPD severity to create balanced cohorts; spirometry results were not available. Outcomes were evaluated over approximately 12 months. Multivariate adjustment was performed for significant baseline differences after PSM. RESULTS: Following PSM, 1286 patients remained in each cohort for analysis (MT: 1238 LAMA; 48 LABA). The only baseline differences that remained after PSM included more all-cause and COPD-related office visits, more COPD-related tests and procedures, and greater use of SAMA/SABAs, for the DT versus MT cohort. Patients in the DT versus MT cohort had lower rates of exacerbation leading to hospitalization (incidence rate ratio: 0.7886; P=0.019), and lower mean COPD-related pharmacy costs PPPM ($300 vs. $379, respectively; P<0.001) and total costs PPPM ($990 vs. $1203, respectively; P=0.003), despite lower mean COPD-related pharmacy fills per patient per month (PPPM) (1.41 vs. 1.51, respectively; P=0.038). A Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that the distribution of switching (P<0.001) and augmentation (P<0.001) over the follow-up period was lower in the DT versus MT cohort. The distribution of non-persistence was higher in the DT versus MT cohort (P<0.001) suggesting lesser symptom burden in the DT cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Patients in the DT cohort had fewer exacerbations leading to hospitalizations, lower COPD-related pharmacy and total costs, and less switching and augmentation compared with patients in the MT cohort.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2018-05, ISPOR 2018, Baltimore, MD, USA
Value in Health, Vol. 21, S1 (May 2018)
Code
PRS48
Topic
Economic Evaluation
Topic Subcategory
Cost/Cost of Illness/Resource Use Studies
Disease
Respiratory-Related Disorders