SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF THE Q-TWIST IN ONCOLOGY

Author(s)

Solem CT, Wan Y, Botteman MF
Pharmerit International, Bethesda, MD, USA

OBJECTIVES: The quality-adjusted time without symptoms and toxicity (Q-TWiST) methodology has been used to assess the clinical benefits (prolonged [progression-free] survival) and costs (toxicities) of oncology therapiesThis study was conducted to systematically review and quantitatively summarize published Q-TWiST assessments of cancer treatments. METHODS: A systematic search and review was conducted in MEDLINE to identify original studies reporting the Q-TWiST information—including time with toxicity (TOX), time before disease progression without toxicity (TWiST), and time in relapse after disease progression (REL)—for all oncology treatment groups, as available. Utilities for Q-TWiST were also captured; when a base case for utilities was not selected in a study, the following was assumed: u(TWiST)=1, u(REL)=0.5, and u(TOX)=0.5. The relative gain in Q-TWiST for active treatment arms was calculated as the difference in Q-TWiST divided by mean overall survival of control arm. Relative gains ≥10% and ≥15% were considered to be a clinically important and clearly clinically important difference, respectively.  RESULTS: Upon review of 84 initially identified articles, 39 were excluded for the following reasons: no Q-TWiST was reported (n=22), not oncology-related (n=13), other reasons (n=4). Forty-five studies were included and reported a total of 69 Q-TWiST comparisons across 10 cancers.  The most commonly used utilities for Q-TWiST calculation were u(TWiST)=1, u(REL)=0.5, u(TOX)=0.5 (n=28, 62.2% of articles). Using base-case utility values, the mean (range) Q-TWiST gain was 5.2 (-6.8 to 61) months and the mean relative gain was 9.0% (-13.3% to 60.0%); 41.8% and 17.9% of studies reported relative gains ≥10% and ≥15%, respectively. Applying u(REL)= u(TOX)=0.5 to comparisons with sufficient data (n=65), the mean standardized Q-TWiST gain was 5.4 (-4.1 to 61) months and mean standardized relative gain was 8.2% (range -15.0% to 54.5%). CONCLUSIONS: This review of Q-TWiST for cancer therapies can serve as benchmark against which future analyses can be compared.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2014-05, ISPOR 2014, Palais des Congres de Montreal

Value in Health, Vol. 17, No. 3 (May 2014)

Code

PRM79

Topic

Methodological & Statistical Research

Topic Subcategory

PRO & Related Methods

Disease

Oncology

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×